Search for: "State v Reed"
Results 881 - 900
of 2,347
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2017, 1:00 am
R (Kiarie) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; R (Byndloss) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 15-16 February 2017. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 7:33 am
AFSCME and several state pension funds, including the nation's largest, the California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS), sent letters to the SEC in mid-November urging Cox to let the AFSCME v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 10:40 am
Justice Thomas delivers the opinion in Reed v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 8:28 am
Or is that "too thin a reed" for a ruling? [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 2:00 am
In contrast, Lord Kerr’s dissenting judgment adopts a far more structured approach to proportionality, closely analysing the four questions identified by Lord Reed in Bank Mellat v HM Treasury (No 2) [2014] AC 700, with particular emphasis on the rational connection between the interference and the legislative objective and the “least intrusive means” test [21]. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 11:16 pm
Lord Sumption and Lord Reed Lord Sumption and Lord Reed consider that the intention of the alleged infringer, whether subjective or objective, is irrelevant and that the sole criterion of infringement is whether the product as it emerges from the manufacturing process, including any labelling or accompanying leaflet, is presented as suitable for the uses which enjoy patent protection – the “outward presentation” test. [read post]
30 Mar 2007, 11:37 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Adel Yazidi v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 5:05 pm
In the following guest post from John Reed Stark, President, John Reed Stark Consulting LLC, and David R. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 4:54 pm
On October 2, while the news covered President Trump’s admission to Walter Reed for treatment of Covid-19, Congressmen Lou Correa (D-CA) and Ted Budd (R-NC) introduced the bipartisan Online Accessibility Act, which they claim will “increase website accessibility and reduce predatory lawsuits filed against businesses. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 1:00 am
R (HC) v Secretary of State for Works and Pensions & Ors, heard 21-22 Jun 2017. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 4:39 am
Lord Reed gives a concurring judgment. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 2:18 pm
That is the question that John Reed Stark, President of John Reed Stark Consulting and former Chief of the SEC’s Office of Internet Enforcement, examines in the following guest post. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 1:45 am
Lord Hodge and Lord Sales gave the main judgment with which Lord Reed, Lady Black and Lord Leggatt agreed. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 9:59 am
Supreme Court in Reed v. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 6:09 am
Ct. 2653 (2011), or the strict scrutiny “topic”-based approach from Reed v. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 5:52 am
In affirming the district court ruling, the appeals court relied on the decision in Reed v. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 5:01 am
In Hosanna-Tabor v. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 2:00 am
Lord Neuberger and Lord Dyson referred to the four-limb test for proportionality in respect of interference with Convention rights as espoused by Lord Reed in Bank Mellat v HM Treasury (No. 2) [2013] UKSC 39. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 2:20 am
” In the ABA Journal, Mark Walsh previews next week’s oral argument in Reed v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 8:31 am
On Monday 26 March 2012 are the appeals from the Supreme Court of Mauritius of Dookee v The State of Mauritius and anor and Sakoor Patel and ors v Anandsing Beenessreesing and Sicom Ltd. [read post]
