Search for: "State v. Call" Results 881 - 900 of 54,482
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2017, 4:13 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
” Filed in response to National Veterans Legal Services Program et al v. [read post]
1 May 2023, 7:05 am by Jason Mazzone
Harper (the so-called independent state legislature (ISL) case) already argued at the U.S. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 8:35 am by Matt Kaiser
We don’t know why the police were at his home or whether they were looking for guns or something else, but in keeping with a theme from United States v. [read post]
24 Nov 2012, 7:14 am by Allard Knook
For advantages to be capable of being categorised as aid within the meaning of that Article , they must, first, be granted directly or indirectly through State resources, and, second, be imputable to the State (Case C‑303/88 Italy v Commission [1991]; Case C‑482/99 France v Commission [2002]; Case C-126/01 GEMO [2003]).The Court furthermore held that it followed from the wording of Art. 87(1) EC that only advantages granted directly or indirectly… [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 9:47 am by brian
The two consolidated cases before us call for interpretation of §924(c) as that provision was reformulated in 1998.... [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 1:40 am
250px-Ruger_P89_3.png In felon in possession of a firearm trial, witness's 911 call after she saw the defendant in a car with a gun was admissible as an excited utterance despite her testimony at trial that she had exaggerated the report in summoning the police; the exaggerations went "to the weight, not the admissibility of the 911 call"; Sixth Circuit concluded the 911 call "better fits the present sense impression exception,"… [read post]