Search for: "State v. Case"
Results 881 - 900
of 175,956
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2019, 9:00 pm
In Blockburger v United States, 284 U.S. 299 (1932), the U.S. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 5:00 am
Regina (Munir) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants intervening): Regina (Rahman) v Same: [2012] UKSC 32; [2012] WLR (D) 213 “If a statement of an immigration policy was flexible and stated that an immigration rule relating to leave to enter and remain in the United Kingdom might, depending on the circumstances of each case, be relaxed if certain conditions were… [read post]
16 Apr 2022, 8:46 am
Continue Reading › The post Massachusetts SJC to decide assisted suicide case of Kliger v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 9:26 am
DUI REDUCED to Reckless Driving – State v. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 5:58 am
In this case comment, Stephen McNaught, Mark McMurray, Josh Risso-Gill and Gael Hardie, who all work within the planning team at CMS, comment on the decision recently handed down by the UK Supreme Court in the matter of Dill v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government and another [2020] UKSC 20, which concerned “listed buildings”. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 7:20 am
The case, Moore v. [read post]
23 Dec 2017, 1:12 pm
Another under-the-radar Supreme Court case this Term is City of Hays v. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 6:30 am
On April 20, 2016, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 8:46 am
This month the United States Supreme Court decided a case that involved North Carolina trust beneficiaries. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 8:55 am
Here is the abstract: In Rucho v. [read post]
3 Aug 2007, 2:12 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department Court of Appeal “When a person appealed against an order for deportation because he feared torture or ill-treatment in his home state, in scrutinising the case, the Special Immigration Appeals Commission was entitled to take into account closed as well as open material. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 2:08 pm
In State v. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 7:00 am
In a previous post, we considered the factual background to the appeals before the Supreme Court this week in the cases of R (MA) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, R (A), and R (Rutherford). [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 4:27 am
As neither of the third parties had dealt with the Secretary of State, the claim could only succeed if the court said that the dealing requirement did not form part of the ratio of OBG or departed from that case (which, incidentally, was one of three cases dealt with together by the House of Lords, one of the others being better-known to IP lawyers: Douglas v Hello!). [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 9:01 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2021, 1:42 pm
Supreme Court’s 1976 decision in United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 9:09 am
In United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 9:14 pm
Missouri v. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 6:46 am
Governor of the State of New Jersey, provides an insightful addition to the growing body of case law examining the clash between the state’s... [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 1:43 pm
The Court held that that the procedure established under Art. 259 TFEU was designed to obtain a declaration that the conduct of a Member State was in breach of EU law and to terminate that conduct (see, to that effect, Joined Cases 15/76 and 16/76 France v Commission [1979]; Case C-456/05 Commission v Germany [2007]; and Joined Cases C-514/07 P, C-528/07 P and C-532/07 P Sweden and Others v API and Commission [2010]).Thus, as the aim of… [read post]
