Search for: "State v. Concepcion"
Results 881 - 900
of 1,156
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2011, 10:44 am
(see, for example, AT & T Mobility v Concepcion)Empirical Research in Indian Arbitration:While qualitative empirical research in law is much more prevalent in India, quantitative research in law is not probably taken as much as is required, at least in the mainstream legal academia. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 11:22 am
In a 7-2 decision, the Court found the state's law violated the First Amendment. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 10:32 am
See Arias v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 6:53 am
Less than a year after the Supreme Court's decision in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 10:39 am
AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 6:45 pm
If you were surprised at the potential effects of Concepcion v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 12:58 pm
In May, in AT&T v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 10:00 am
Concepcion decision before it, today’s decision in Dukes v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 6:39 am
Michael Kirkland of UPI describes the facts in United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 3:04 am
Concepcion. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 5:08 pm
See Smith v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 11:03 am
Concepcion. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 10:43 am
Concepcion, but the considerably more arcane Baptista v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 7:01 am
The Class Actions Post-Concepcion: A Defining Moment in American Jurisprudence Whatever happened to state’s rights, Justice Scalia? [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 5:01 am
Concepcion, 131 S. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 12:47 pm
Concepcion, ___ U.S. ___ (2011), that a state law that banned class action waivers in arbitration agreements was invalid and preempted by the Federal Arbitration Act. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 11:47 am
Concepcion, ___ U.S. ___ (2011), that a state law that banned class action waivers in arbitration agreements was invalid and preempted by the Federal Arbitration Act. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 7:05 am
Concepcion (No. 09-893) and Wal-Mart v. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 2:10 pm
Concepcion, the recent Supreme Court case where the Court held that the Federal Arbitration Act preempts state law unconscionability arguments which are applied disproportionately to invalidate arbitration agreements. [read post]
