Search for: "State v. Cook" Results 881 - 900 of 3,550
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Dec 2013, 1:14 am by Laura Sandwell
Stott v Thomas Cook Tour Operators Ltd, heard 20 November 2013. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 1:14 am by Laura Sandwell
Stott v Thomas Cook Tour Operators Ltd, heard 20 November 2013. [read post]
3 Feb 2019, 4:44 pm
 Re Allen, at para. 32, cites an unreported New Zealand decision, Cook v. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 6:44 pm by Steve Hall
  The 1986 Supreme Court ruling in Ford v. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 2:00 am by Gabriel Granatstein
  At the tap of a finger we can now enjoy our favourite restaurant-cooked meals in the comfort of our own homes. [read post]
3 Jan 2016, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
In the first, Cooke v MGN, the claimant failed – largely because of the prompt withdrawal of the allegation and apology by the defendant (see the Inforrm case comment). [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 3:02 am by Walter Olson
Sued if you do, sued if you don’t: drugmaker faces lawsuits over failure to provide Fosamax warning that FDA told it not to provide [Jim Copland, James Beck on Merck Sharp & Dohme v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 11:03 am by John Elwood
After the Supreme Court denied as moot the closely watched Second Amendment case New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 9:30 pm by ernst
Bell, is the Bobby Lee Cook Professor of Law, was named the 2021 recipient of the Jay Healey Teaching Award of the American Society for Law, Medicine & Ethics. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 6:16 pm
Although a limited amount of recreational marijuana is legal in some states now, including Illinois, there are still many drugs that are considered illegal in the state. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 2:02 am by Laura Sandwell
On Tuesday 4 March 2014 is the matter of R (George) v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 6:21 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Tech., Inc., 523 U.S. 751, 756 (1998) (stating that “tribal immunity is a matter of federal law and is not subject to diminution by the States”); Cook v. [read post]