Search for: "State v. Foster" Results 881 - 900 of 3,991
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2013, 1:13 pm by Kathryn Fort
In fact, the interpretation about how ICWA is a balancing statute between two sovereigns, the state and the tribe may not be all that persuasive to the Court. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 7:36 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Stott) v Secretary of State for Justice was heard on 18 Jan 2018. [read post]
26 May 2016, 5:15 am by SHG
In the afterglow of the Supreme Court’s decision in Foster v. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 4:55 pm by INFORRM
What legal principles connect publicity for the 17 year-old Charlie Pearce (born 3 July 2000), a double rapist and attempt murderer (R v Pearce (Press Restrictions) Haddon-Cave J (7 December 2017)) and privacy for a stalking mother who, with her cohabitant (‘Mr JM’) tried to disrupt her 10 year-old daughter T’s foster placement (Re T (A Child) [2017] EWCA Civ 1889 (23 November 2017)). [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 1:25 pm by Stephen Bilkis
As stated by the Second Department in Barnes v County of Nassau (108 AD2d at 54), the duty to care for the welfare of the children is imposed on the [municipality] by the State (Social Services Law §§395, 398), including the responsibility to place the children in foster homes or other institutions under proper safeguards (Social Services Law §398[6][g]), to supervise the children while in foster homes (Social Services Law §398[6][h]),… [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 7:29 am
  In January, the Supreme Court invited the Solicitor General to file a brief expressing the views of the United States concerning the pending cert petition in CNN, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 7:20 am by Amy Howe
In the second case, Kaley v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 8:13 am by Adam Chandler
” Ruthann Robson of Constitutional Law Prof Blog notes that “[w]ithout much fanfare, President Obama signed into law the Animal Crush Video Prohibition Act of 2010, intended to cure the defects of the previous [animal cruelty] law, held unconstitutional last April in United States v. [read post]