Search for: "State v. Frank" Results 881 - 900 of 4,440
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2023, 5:17 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Here, the plaintiff failed to state a cause of action to recover damages for legal malpractice because the plaintiff’s allegation that the restaurant would have had increased profits but for the defendants’ alleged malpractice is [*2]conclusory and speculative (see York v Frank, 209 AD3d at 807; Denisco v Uysal, 195 AD3d at 991). [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  Matter of Lockwood v County of Suffolk 2023 NY Slip Op 04316 Decided on August 16, 2023 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  Matter of Lockwood v County of Suffolk 2023 NY Slip Op 04316 Decided on August 16, 2023 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 10:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
In some respects, the DC Circuit's decision in Business Roundtable v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 5:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
  Had issuers supported the proposal by the Cox Commission, it is likely that Mary Schapiro's Commission would not have proposed an access rule, Dodd-Frank would not have given access authority to the Commission, and shareholders would not now be singularly focused on the issue. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 4:44 pm by INFORRM
The deal was characterised as “underhand, dubious and lacking in frankness” [13]. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 1:48 pm by Unknown
Foley (Tribal Courts; Child Welfare) In re: Conditions at Lake County Jail (Treaty Rights; Sovereign Immunity) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2022.html Wren v. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 11:21 am
Yet when the states began to reconstruct capital statutes in the aftermath of Furman v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 11:52 am by nflatow
Cooper, state appellate defender Valerie Newman said it was the justices’ hostility that surprised her the most. [read post]