Search for: "State v. Irish" Results 881 - 900 of 1,158
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2011, 5:51 pm by INFORRM
However under Art. 5(3) a person domiciled in a Member State can also be sued in tort in the courts of the Member State where the harmful event occurred. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 12:30 am by Máiréad Enright
In its Programme for Government, the Fine Gael and Labour coalition states: We acknowledge the recent ruling of the European Court of Human Rights subsequent to the established ruling of the Irish Supreme Court on the X-case. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 7:40 am
Louis Vuitton v Nadia Plesner). [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 2:32 am by GuestPost
Closer to home, here’s hoping that what has been happening in the UK helps to expedite proactive efforts to implement mooted clinical initiatives in Irish law schools. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 3:14 am by Yvonne Daly
Kearns P. noted that there was a “manifest need” for effective measures to regulate the entry into the State of undocumented non-Irish nationals and declined to deem s.12 a disproportionate measure. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 10:11 am
Citing Sisojeva v Latvia (Eur. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
Google v Louis Vuitton C-236/08 which considered the degree of ‘neutrality’ on the part of an intermediary. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 3:32 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
The claimant argued that, as entitlement to SPC was extended to Irish nationals, it was discriminatory not to extend it to nationals of other Member States. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 3:26 am by Adam Wagner
The relevance of the treatment of Irish nationals The Appellant argued that, as entitlement to SPC was extended to Irish nationals, it was discriminatory not to extend it to nationals of other Member States. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 9:47 pm by Mike
 He made plenty of incriminating statements to Irish authorities that I am not going to republish here. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 1:45 am by Liam Thornton
(See, Fajujonu v Minister for Justice [1990] 2 IR 151). [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 7:58 am by Liam Thornton
  This decision shows an even more progressive interpretation to EU citizenship and residency law than set down in Chen & Ors. v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] ECR I-9925 . [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 10:59 pm by Graeme Hall
Ciaran TONER v the United Kingdom – 8195/08 [2011] ECHR 375 (15 February 2011): Northern Irish prisoner fails in Euro human rights challenge against refusal to allow him to vote as he missed voting registration deadline and was therefore too late in bringing claim. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 1:13 pm by Daithí
If the UK does end up deciding in favour of fair use, then that’s two states lobbying for it. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 9:05 pm by GuestPost
The recent decision of the Administrative Appeals Chamber of the Upper Tribunal in the case of A.H. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 6:43 am by Adam Wagner
But, as pointed out in the Irish Times, the ruling may in fact make things fairer all round. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 5:01 am by INFORRM
Moreover, the Supreme Court in the case of De Rossa v Independent Newspapers endorsed the view that juries should not be given guidelines on damages by judges. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 1:24 pm by NL
Article 8 did not require contracting states to make suitable sites available to gypsies (Chapman v UK). [read post]