Search for: "State v. Kelly" Results 881 - 900 of 2,123
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jan 2022, 4:33 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In Reem Contr. v Altschul & Altschul  2022 NY Slip Op 00021 Decided on January 04, 2022 Appellate Division, First Department the Appellate Division reversed and gave defendants a second chance. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 3:47 am by SHG
Yet they took him to the precinct and wrote a false report stating that he was in criminal possession of a weapon. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 7:00 am by Ellen Podgor
United States, finding that licenses were not property; Skilling v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 3:13 pm by Mark Walsh
” He goes on, in an eloquent vein, not the more businesslike tone he took with his announcement in United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2008, 5:00 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 12:51 pm by James Eckert
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, V PATRICK HACKETT, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.WYOMING COUNTY-ATTICA LEGAL AID BUREAU, WARSAW (NORMAN P. [read post]
1 Jun 2008, 1:34 pm
In NMCCA's en banc decision in United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 5:03 am by Public Employment Law Press
" As the court held in Matter of Kelly v DiNapoli, 30 NY3d 674, "an injury-causing event is accidental when it is sudden, unexpected and not a risk of the work performed, but the focus of the determination must be on the precipitating cause of [the] injury, rather than on the petitioner's job assignment. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 5:03 am by Public Employment Law Press
" As the court held in Matter of Kelly v DiNapoli, 30 NY3d 674, "an injury-causing event is accidental when it is sudden, unexpected and not a risk of the work performed, but the focus of the determination must be on the precipitating cause of [the] injury, rather than on the petitioner's job assignment. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 5:03 am by Public Employment Law Press
" As the court held in Matter of Kelly v DiNapoli, 30 NY3d 674, "an injury-causing event is accidental when it is sudden, unexpected and not a risk of the work performed, but the focus of the determination must be on the precipitating cause of [the] injury, rather than on the petitioner's job assignment. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In Kelly v Levin, 81 AD2d 1005, the court ruled that acquitting an employee in an administrative disciplinary action based on the same charges underlying the individual's  criminal conviction was a reversible error because the standard of proof in the criminal action was greater. [read post]