Search for: "State v. Link" Results 881 - 900 of 21,175
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Oct 2010, 8:14 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
Issue summaries from ScotusBlog, which also links to cert papers and opinions below: Bond v. [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 7:13 pm by CrimProf BlogEditor
Issue summary is from ScotusBlog, which also links to papers: Monday Brumfield v. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 11:15 pm
Here's a corrected link to the defense's reply to the Government's opposition to the reconsideration petition in United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2021, 12:51 pm by CrimProf BlogEditor
Issue summary is from ScotusBlog, which also links to papers: U.S. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2012, 7:21 pm by CrimProf BlogEditor
Issue summary is from ScotusBlog, which includes links to papers: Cavazos v. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm by Kali Borkoski
In the afternoon, the Justices will hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2022, 9:41 am by Eric Goldman
A click fraud case against a competitor: Motogolf fails to state a false advertising claim under the Lanham Act. [read post]
4 Oct 2007, 7:20 am
Howell, the pro se case in which a judge stated that "making available" was actionable, the pro se defendant sent the judge copies of the amicus curiae briefs which had been submitted in Elektra v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 7:18 am
Moments ago, the United States Supreme Court invited the Solicitor General to file a brief expressing the government's view on whether the Court should grant certiorari in American Home Products v. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 2:33 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
There needs to be a causal link between the PCP and the particular disadvantage, but this does not require a causal link between the characteristic and the treatment. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 8:05 am
Supreme Court in argued cases: The first and only decision announced today is United States v. [read post]
14 May 2010, 2:37 am by traceydennis
Cooper v Attorney General  [2010] EWCA Civ 464; [2010] WLR (D) 122 “The obligation of a member states to make good damage caused to individuals by infringements of Community law for which they were responsible also applied where the alleged infringement stemmed from a decision of a court adjudicating at last instance where the rule of Community law infringed was intended to confer rights on individuals, the breach was sufficiently serious and there was a direct causal… [read post]