Search for: "State v. Lord"
Results 881 - 900
of 3,607
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2015, 9:30 am
v=n83m1ZbclBs&feature=youtu.be Follow @azatty [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 2:26 am
Lord Neuberger and Lord Mance, however, did state that although this was an inappropriate case in which to decide the proper approach to the defence of illegality, there was a need for review of the law of illegality by the Supreme Court. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 2:37 am
In giving the lead judgment, Lord Sumption stated that the fundamental principle of the common law of damages is the compensatory principle. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 1:00 am
R (HC) v Secretary of State for Works and Pensions & Ors, heard 21-22 Jun 2017. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 1:38 am
The lead judgment was given by Lord Neuberger (with which Lord Sumption, Lord Hughes and Lord Hodge agreed). [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 5:34 am
Comment Lord Walker concluded his judgment on the expenditure issue by confirming that the previous House of Lords decisions in this area (namely, Ensign Tankers and Barclays Mercantile) remain good law. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 1:00 pm
- For EC Member States, according to Allianz v. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 9:36 am
Regina v, Crawley, et al., Court of Appeals, May 21, 2014. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 12:45 am
This issue was considered at length in Lord Browne of Madingley v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2008] QB 103. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 5:42 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) R. v SVS Solicitors [2012] EWCA Crim 319 (15 February 2012) A v B & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 285 (14 March 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Maqsood v Mahmood & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 251 (13 March 2012) JD (Congo) & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 327 (16 March 2012) Barr & Ors v Biffa Waste Services Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 312 (19 March 2012) High Court… [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 9:35 am
Lord Hope based [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 2:55 am
Lord Wilson dismissed it on the basis that information held predominantly for the purposes of journalism was exempt, and that the Balen Report fell under this category of information. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 3:51 am
The court went on to state that the Lord Ordinary had a reasonable evidential basis for finding on an objective analysis that the bank made a legally binding promise in the telephone call of 14 June 2007 to provide development finding. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 6:31 am
Lord, I'm ready to go home. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 2:48 am
In giving the lead judgment for the majority, Lord Neuberger stated the terms in clause 19(2) which outline the stress test to identify if a CDE has occurred, had to be treated as a reference to the new CRD IV Directive requirements instead of only being applicable to the old requirements under CRD I Directive. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 8:29 am
Supreme Court Judgment The Supreme Court unanimously dismissed Mr Williams’s appeal and upheld the Court of Appeal’s decision, Lord Carnwarth giving the sole judgment. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 5:27 pm
[Week commencing 13 August] Full Fact v Evening Standard, Clause 1, 17/08/2012; Joseph Horner v The Observer, Clause 1, 16/08/2012; Mr Christopher Mackin v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Jane Hughes v The Independent on Sunday, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Dr Yannis Alexandrides v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Mr Oliver Gray v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Alex Jarvis v Daily Mail, Clauses 3, 5, 15/08/2012; Inspired Thinking Group… [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:13 am
However, neither court commented on whether the EPO’s requirement that an overlapping range should have a technical effect is consistent with the UK novelty requirement established by Lord Hoffmann in Synthon BV v Smithkline Beecham plc [2005] UKHL 59. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:20 pm
The state is under various obligations under Article 2. [read post]
