Search for: "State v. Main" Results 881 - 900 of 10,289
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Sandler December 1 is the deadline for broadcast stations licensed to communities in Alabama, Colorado, Connecticut, Georgia, Maine, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Montana, New Hampshire, North Dakota, Rhode Island, South Dakota, and Vermont to place their Annual EEO Public File Report in their Public Inspection File and post the report on their station website. [read post]
24 Aug 2024, 6:15 am by Lawrence Solum
Marion County Elections Board, which allowed states to enforce voter ID laws and make it harder for people to vote The Court v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 1:32 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:26 pm by WIMS
Joining Massachusetts in the motion to intervene were the states of Arizona, California, Connecticut, Delaware, Iowa, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, New Hampshire, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Washington, and the City of New York. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 10:31 am by Kent Scheidegger
Burwell.The main issue of that case is, of course, off-topic for the blog, and CJLF takes no position on it. [read post]
13 Jun 2007, 8:56 pm
  Read the second paragraph from the story:The case, Kathleen and Gordon Schafer v. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 8:45 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Here are the main highlights: Points of interest There was an interesting article discussing the recent report published by Sir Geoffery Bindman QC and Karon Monaghan QC called Judicial Diversity: Accelerating Change. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 11:29 am by Brianna Perrone and Thomas Urban
Azcarate to release copies of transcripts relating to the Depp v. [read post]
2 Apr 2016, 8:50 am by Patrick McGinnis
Interestingly, the main evidence presented by the policyholder in Hamilton was deposition testimony from the two insurance adjusters who investigated the claim for the carrier. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:45 am by Blog Editorial
  Lord Pannick QC says it is no answer for the Government to say that the long title to the 1972 Act “says nothing about withdrawal“. 16:04: Lord Pannick QC refers to the case of Robinson v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, which he submits supports a “flexible response” to constitutional developments. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:41 am by Adam Chandler
United States and United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 2:22 pm by Amy Howe
(William Hennessy) Members of the court saw two main problems with Thompson’s argument. [read post]