Search for: "State v. Minor"
Results 881 - 900
of 16,394
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Sep 2023, 1:57 pm
The Sixth Circuit recently heard argument in L.W. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
In October 2020, a 450-page report emerged, “Investigation of Competition in Digital Markets,” issued by the majority staff with separate and largely dissenting reports from the Republican minority. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 10:33 am
From Junior Sports Magazines, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 3:10 pm
The Court’s analysis was guided by cases such as Goleta Union School District v. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 2:53 pm
Whether all reasonable steps have been taken will be fact-specific and the hurdle is a high one; the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) stated in its Statutory Code of Practice that “an employer would be considered to have taken all reasonable steps if there were no further steps that they could have been expected to take…” The scope of the defence was recently considered by the employment tribunal (ET) in Fischer v London United Busways Ltd, a gender… [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 5:00 am
For example, minors’ access to contraception is a perennial issue. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 7:54 pm
Hudson v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 3:00 pm
” In West Virginia v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 12:45 pm
The Biden administration appealed the ruling in United States v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 9:57 am
See also, Safer Chemicals, Healthy Families v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 7:55 am
An issue that came up during a terrific panel that I participated in last Thursday—organized by the Federalist Society’s Regulatory Transparency Project—was whether age-verification laws for social-media use infringed on a First Amendment right of either adults or minors to receive speech anonymously. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 4:37 am
Earlier this year, using as a springboard the Maryland intermediate appellate court’s decision in Eastland Food Corp. v Mekhaya, I posted about a topic on which there’s little or no New York law, viz., whether a complaint for minority shareholder oppression stated a valid claim centered on allegations that the directors/majority shareholders, instead of declaring profit distributions for all shareholders, were taking disguised distributions in the form of… [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 4:30 am
Blogpost 36/2023 WS v Frontex, case T-600/21, decided by the General Court on the 6th of September 2023, concerns a number of Syrian nationals who arrived in 2016 on the Greek island of Milos with the intention of claiming asylum. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 2:30 am
In line with its previous findings that damage is required for compensation, the Court states that a person affected needs to prove non-material damage (para. 50). [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 5:59 pm
See Cygnus Opportunity Fund, LLC v. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 7:49 am
[Note: one minor correction to the court’s description. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 5:51 am
Those cases: United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 2:05 am
Supreme Court clarified this standard in Groff v. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 7:24 pm
Furthermore, the report asserted that Manipur’s state government “turned partisan” during the ethnic conflict, perpetrating the vilification of ethnic minorities and promoting the majority Meitei community. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 7:32 am
Ross; Moore v. [read post]