Search for: "State v. Murray" Results 881 - 900 of 1,332
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Murray Regan served as a teacher and, in that capacity, he was a member of the New York State Teachers' Retirement System [TRS] for over 30 years when, in January 1998, he simultaneously began to serve as an elected town supervisor. [read post]
30 Nov 2014, 3:58 pm by Jag
If the state cannot show that all 3 of the above conditions have been met the interference will be unlawful. [read post]
30 Nov 2014, 3:58 pm by Jag
If the state cannot show that all 3 of the above conditions have been met the interference will be unlawful. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
By contrast, in the United States (see Firth v New York, 747 NYS 2d 69 (2002)) and in England (see the notes to section 8 of the Defamation Act 2013), the single-publication rule means a cause of action accrues only when the material is first accessed. [read post]
21 Oct 2018, 4:59 pm by INFORRM
Stephen Murray considers the outcome in an INFORRM post. [read post]
17 Jan 2007, 8:04 am
On January 5, 2007, the Supreme Court granted certiorari to the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in Panetti v. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 3:10 pm by Michael Fox
  The bill was introduced by Senator Menendez (D - NJ) and at this point has only three co-sponsors, Senators Gillibrand (D-NY), Murray (D-Wash), and Harkin (D-Iowa). [read post]
12 Feb 2023, 5:03 pm by INFORRM
United States Texas State Representative, Giovanni Capriglione, introduced a privacy bill to the state legislature which closely follows the Virginia Consumer Data Protection Act. [read post]
30 Jan 2022, 4:46 pm by INFORRM
Mr Palmer argues comments made by Mr McGowan in 2020, which included calling him an “enemy” of the state, damaged his reputation. [read post]
See, e.g., Murray Hill Publ’ns, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 6:54 am by Joy Waltemath
Moreover, the supervisor who she accused of drug use was not similarly situated since it is easier to promptly investigate a charge of drug diversion, and both state regulations and company policy recognize drug diversion as a problem requiring prompt investigation and decisive sanction (Murray v. [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 4:29 pm by INFORRM
United States The internet cases blog has covered the case of Benson v. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 8:07 am by Eugene Volokh
Long ago, the United States Supreme Court concluded that the "seas" referenced in one statute required no water at all (Murray's Lessee v. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 7:39 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Murray Hill Publ’ns, Inc. v. [read post]