Search for: "State v. Sharpe"
Results 881 - 900
of 2,564
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
Sharp Also Protect Same-Sex Couples' Right to Marry? [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 6:34 am
Not Dead Yet Manufacturing Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 8:49 pm
Davila of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California granted IPCom's December 2021 motion to dismiss an amended complaint by Lenovo and its Motorola Mobility subsidiary that alleged breach of contract, monopolization in violation of U.S. antitrust law (Sherman Act Sec. 2), and sought a declaratory judgment of non-infringement of two IPCom patents. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 6:43 pm
Since there is no obligation for companies to include projections based on assumptions about future price trends, the shareholder had no viable claims (Heinze v. [read post]
13 Nov 2016, 6:13 am
Also at Public Books is a review of Benjamin Peters' How Not to Network a Nation: The Uneasy History of the Soviet Internet.A Fiery and Furious People: a History of Violence in England by James Sharpe is reviewed in The Times Literary Supplement and the New Statesman.Mary Beard discusses her SPQR: A History of Ancient Rome in the Los Angeles Review of Books.Cornelia Hughes Dayton and Sharon V. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 4:56 am
People v. [read post]
28 Jul 2012, 6:17 am
” United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 6:28 am
California and United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 6:25 am
Ctr., February 2, 2017, In the Supreme Court of Washington State More Blog Entries: Alcala v. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 8:55 am
Sharpe (1954), a companion case to Brown v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 12:50 pm
See United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2009, 12:22 pm
Last week, in Yeager v. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 5:13 am
The Supreme Court’s consideration of these issues (and of the impact of s 377 on personal autonomy and privacy in general) on appeal in Koushal v Naz Foundation (“Koushal”) was notoriously cursory, as explored by Sheikh and Narrain.[1]The complex interplay between formal criminalisation, a lack of reported prosecutions and societal stigma is reflected both in the sharp disparity between Naz Foundation and Koushal’s treatment of s 377 and to diverse,… [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 5:13 am
The Supreme Court’s consideration of these issues (and of the impact of s 377 on personal autonomy and privacy in general) on appeal in Koushal v Naz Foundation (“Koushal”) was notoriously cursory, as explored by Sheikh and Narrain.[1]The complex interplay between formal criminalisation, a lack of reported prosecutions and societal stigma is reflected both in the sharp disparity between Naz Foundation and Koushal’s treatment of s 377 and to diverse,… [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 7:38 am
In State v. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 4:50 am
The declaration must provide a useful purpose rather than serving as a punishment for perceived ‘sharp practice’ by a patentee. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 8:23 pm
V, at p. 222). [read post]
18 Jul 2021, 4:05 pm
Junejo v New Vision TV Limited, heard 24 and 25 March 2021 (Murray J) Miller v College of Policing and another, heard 9 and 10 March 2021 (Sharp P, Haddon-Cave and Simler LJJ) Wright [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 6:18 am
Judging from this morning’s oral argument in Lockhart v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 3:31 am
The 54-page decision by a Minnesota state court judge in Lund v Lund, Decision, Order & Judgment, No. 27-CV-14-20058 [Minn. [read post]
