Search for: "State v. So "
Results 881 - 900
of 117,821
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2017, 5:00 am
I’m not so sure. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 8:54 am
Flaws in Balanced Budget AmendmentConvention of States ProjectConvention Of The States: Wrong On History, NullificationTea Party Patriot’s Article V Symposium [read post]
21 May 2009, 7:49 am
In Campbell v. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 9:49 am
In Israel v. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 9:49 am
In Israel v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 3:45 pm
[Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment and the Incompatibility Clause both apply to "officers under the United States" and must thus mean the same thing] The oral argument today in Trump v. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 7:00 am
Most states have modeled their law after the South Dakota law analyzed in South Dakota v. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 2:00 pm
The Ninth Circuit reversed, holding as follows: Under State Board of Chiropractic Examiners v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 9:14 am
The latest in this series of cases is the judgment of the Andhra High Court in Muralidhar Rao v. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 7:17 am
Here are the materials in United States v. [read post]
21 May 2014, 6:54 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Sep 2024, 6:30 am
Because the states generally cannot solve such problems on their own, the Constitution empowers the federal government, and Congress in particular, to do so. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 2:55 pm
(Orin Kerr) Some readers have asked me about the oral argument schedule in United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 10:46 am
In CODE REVISION COMMISSION and State of Georgia v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 12:00 am
And, where it is found, the state should be compelled to ensure such misconduct is addressed so it is no longer a factor. [read post]
United States v. Fosler: CAAF holds Article 134 adultery sample specification fails to state offense
8 Aug 2011, 11:53 pm
Is Parker v. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 6:27 am
See Northern Border Pipeline Co. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 5:19 am
In Young v. [read post]
23 Dec 2017, 10:36 am
Several years ago, Florida lawmakers decided to enact a measure that would alter F.S. 90.702 (testimony by experts) and F.S. 90.704 (basis of opinion testimony by experts), forgoing the so-called “Frye standard” (so named for the 1923 case of Frye v. [read post]
10 Jun 2018, 3:45 pm
In State v. [read post]
