Search for: "State v. Taylor" Results 881 - 900 of 3,051
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Nov 2013, 9:42 am by WSLL
Order Reversing Judgment and Sentence November 14, 2013Case Name: TAYLOR FORREST COBB v. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 4:28 am by INFORRM
The Court also observed that nuisance does not protect privacy in related jurisdictions, referring to the High Court of Australia decision in Victoria Park Racing and Recreation Grounds Co Ltd v Taylor ((1937) 58 CLR 479). [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 9:01 am
Louisiana (on the constitutionality of the death penalty for child rape) No. 07-371, Taylor v. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 9:02 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
On September 16, 2015, the federal government decided to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada the case of Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) v. [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 2:16 pm by crimdefense@hotmail.com
(v) An individual to whom the person is related or was formerly related bymarriage. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 3:28 am
United States, 581 F.2d 390, 397 (4th Cir. 1978). [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 3:06 am by Walter Olson
” [Posner, chief judge, in People Who Care v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 8:58 pm
Recently on October 10, 2008, Connecticut became the third state to legalize same-sex marriage in Kerrigan v. the State Commissioner of Public Health in which the state Supreme Court struck down a statutory ban by a 4-3 decision. -- This Federalist Society panel will focus on the proper role of the judiciary. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 5:00 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 18624 (ND NY, Feb. 8, 2017), a New York federal magistrate judge recommended dismissing the complaint of a number of Muslim inmates that their 1st and 14th Amendment rights were violated when they were not allowed to attend Jumm'ah services on Dec. 25, 2015.In Taylor v. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 4:15 am
"In formulating his ruling, Justice Devine noted the decision by the Appellate Division in Civil Service Employees Ass'n v New York State Public Employee Relations Board, 46 AD3d 1037, but concluded that the decision was not a controlling precedent in this case. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 1:05 am by Ken Lammers
Not to be deterred, the Court of Appeals has tried again in Taylor v. [read post]