Search for: "State v. Town of Grants" Results 881 - 900 of 1,918
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2007, 10:12 am
Rather, he invites the State to violate two of the most basic norms of a civilized society - that the State's penal authority be invoked only where necessary to serve the ends of justice, not the ends of a particular individual, and that punishment be imposed only where the State has adequate assurance that the punishment is justified.United States Supreme Court Justice, 1990(1)Robert Comer, Christopher Newton and Elijah Page have something in common, aside… [read post]
13 Nov 2010, 9:04 am
Generally, 'leave to amend a complaint rests within the trial court's discretion and should be freely granted in the absence of prejudice or surprise resulting from the delay except in situations where the proposed amendment is wholly devoid of merit' (Berger v Water Commrs. of Town of Waterford, 296 AD2d 649, 649 [2002];see CPLR 3025 [b]). [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 3:48 pm by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) On September 30, Judge Doherty of the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana handed down a decision in Vidrine v. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 11:10 pm
  The Court granted review Feb. 25. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 11:42 am by Meg Martin
Summary of Decision issued March 23, 2010Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court.Case Name: Excel Construction, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 7:39 am by Patricia Salkin
Town of Patterson Zoning Bd. of Appeals, 43 A.D.3d 926, 929, 841 N.Y.S.2d 650 [2007]; see Matter of Cohen v. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 2:31 pm
State of New York, 62 N.Y.2d 506, 510, 478 N.Y.S.2d 829, 467 N.E.2d 493; O'Connor v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 10:08 am by Erin Miller
Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioners’ reply Amicus brief of Legal Historians and Habeas Corpus Experts Title: Townes v. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 5:30 am
While state courts in matrimonial actions are often asked by an ex-spouse to modify an existing child support obligation under Lepis v. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 4:25 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Given the [*2]absence of detailed facts, the legal malpractice cause of action should have been dismissed (see Janker v Silver, Forrester & Lesser, P.C., 135 AD3d 908, 910 [2016]; Rodriguez v Jacoby & Meyers, LLP, 126 AD3d at 1185-1186; Kreamer v Town of Oxford, 96 AD3d 1128, 1128 [2012]; compare Soule v Lozada, 232 AD2d 825, 825 [1996]). [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 12:43 am
Each town, each village, each school district, each special district and each authority are separate layoff units. [read post]