Search for: "State v. William Strong" Results 881 - 900 of 1,366
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2013, 9:02 pm by Lyle Denniston
Thomas, though, has stated that view as a dissenter, most notably in the 2002 decision in Harris v. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 7:52 pm by Larry Catá Backer
Jindal Global University; Formerly Professor and Dean, Faculty of Law, University of Delhi, India Enforcing Socio-Economic Rights through Public Interest Litigation: An Overview of the Indian Experience 3) Dr Leïla Choukroune, Senior Lecturer in International Economic Law, Faculty of Law, Maastricht University, The Netherlands The Paradox of Justiciability: Labour PIL in China and India Questions/Comments 6:30pm-8:30pm – Welcome Dinner hosted by the City University Law School (by… [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 11:48 pm by Peter Tillers
The theories of evidence and inference that now dominate the law are firmly planted in the so-called rationalist tradition of evidence scholarship, a tradition that has been masterfully described by William Twining.3 In that tradition, it is axiomatic that all knowledge of facts is merely probable and always uncertain. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 9:01 pm by John Dean
  Norquist states that his pledge is self-enforcing—”candidates and incumbents solemnly bind themselves”—but in a leading case cited in the Standler essay (above), Schaefer v. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 2:28 pm by Daniel Isenberg
Awuku, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWHC 3298 (Admin) - QBD President names and shames 3 solicitors who failed disclosure duties in without notice removal stay applications. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 9:46 am by Cicely Wilson
The state has a legitimate interest in maintaining its precinct-based voting system; there is a strong public interest that militates against changing the rules during early voting. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 9:46 am by Cicely Wilson
The state has a legitimate interest in maintaining its precinct-based voting system; there is a strong public interest that militates against changing the rules during early voting. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 9:46 am by Cicely Wilson
The state has a legitimate interest in maintaining its precinct-based voting system; there is a strong public interest that militates against changing the rules during early voting. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am by Terry Hart
Doyal, a company that licensed films challenged the collection of state taxes on the gross receipts of royalties from its licenses.8 The company argued that its copyrights were “instrumentalities” of the federal government and, thus, immune from state taxation. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am by Terry Hart
” As support, it then stated, “In Fox Film Corp. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 3:10 pm by Russell Beck
Nevada: The United States District Court for the District of Nevada held in Switch Communications Group v. [read post]