Search for: "Supervisors v. United States"
Results 881 - 900
of 1,709
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2018, 7:03 am
The plaintiffs argued that the court was bound by its earlier precedent in Hicks v. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 6:30 am
Their allegations that IBM fraudulently stated it was streamlining its workforce and that it had no other employment opportunities for them when it intended to recruit and hire college graduates to take their jobs were also sufficient to state a fraudulent inducement claim (McCormack v. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 4:40 am
His supervisor stated that “[i]f Mr. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 5:00 am
United States Department of Labor, June 13, 2019, Quattlebaum, A.). [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 2:00 am
Code, § 66000 et seq.) and the takings clause of the United States Constitution, namely the special application of the “unconstitutional conditions doctrine” in the context of land use exactions established in Nollan v. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 4:25 pm
Cage testified that they knew and when pressed he stated that he had told the individual who had trained him at this new employer what had happened. [read post]
24 Oct 2015, 5:32 am
And Ben brought us this week's episode of Rational Security: Cody shared the video from a Q&A with European Data Protection Supervisor Giovanni Buttarelli on the state of play following the ECJ’s decisions in Schrems v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 1:55 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
Appellate Court Shuts Out Trial Court in CEQA/ESA Double Header under Deferential Standard of Review
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am
Both federal and state environmental review were necessitated for the project, however the appellate court only reviewed the relevant state law issues. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 9:00 pm
United States. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 11:37 am
In Williams v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 4:15 am
Ruling that DiBattista did not have property interest in the position, the Appellate Division concluded that he was not entitled to the protection of Town Law §155.* Civil Service Law §75(1)(b) provides, in pertinent part, that a person holding a position by permanent appointment or employment in the classified service “who was honorably discharged or released under honorable circumstances from the armed forces of the United States having served therein as such… [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 9:39 am
Sansone appealed that decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 1:56 pm
ShareFrom the beginning of Monday’s oral argument in Ohio Adjutant General’s Department v. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 3:15 am
The State of Texas, et al., Appellants, v. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 3:15 am
The State of Texas, et al., Appellants, v. [read post]
6 May 2015, 4:32 am
He has filed his state-law intrusion-upon-seclusion claim against Paula, only (Count V). [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 4:51 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit has adopted a three step approach to aid courts in determining whether an activity constitutes “work” for purposes of the FLSA. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 4:13 pm
KJH v HGF [2010] EWHC 3064. [read post]
