Search for: "Taylor v. State"
Results 881 - 900
of 3,056
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 4:28 am
The Court also observed that nuisance does not protect privacy in related jurisdictions, referring to the High Court of Australia decision in Victoria Park Racing and Recreation Grounds Co Ltd v Taylor ((1937) 58 CLR 479). [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 9:01 am
Louisiana (on the constitutionality of the death penalty for child rape) No. 07-371, Taylor v. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 9:02 am
On September 16, 2015, the federal government decided to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada the case of Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) v. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 9:42 am
Order Reversing Judgment and Sentence November 14, 2013Case Name: TAYLOR FORREST COBB v. [read post]
13 May 2008, 11:22 am
LEXIS 37602, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 2:16 pm
(v) An individual to whom the person is related or was formerly related bymarriage. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 3:28 am
United States, 581 F.2d 390, 397 (4th Cir. 1978). [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 8:51 am
The Honorable Judge William Fletcher Taylor-ed to a T.Menendez v. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 4:28 am
(See Lawrence v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 10:51 am
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 3:06 am
” [Posner, chief judge, in People Who Care v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 8:58 pm
Recently on October 10, 2008, Connecticut became the third state to legalize same-sex marriage in Kerrigan v. the State Commissioner of Public Health in which the state Supreme Court struck down a statutory ban by a 4-3 decision. -- This Federalist Society panel will focus on the proper role of the judiciary. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 4:21 am
Taylor Jr. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 6:41 am
Reil v. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 4:50 am
State v. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 5:00 am
LEXIS 18624 (ND NY, Feb. 8, 2017), a New York federal magistrate judge recommended dismissing the complaint of a number of Muslim inmates that their 1st and 14th Amendment rights were violated when they were not allowed to attend Jumm'ah services on Dec. 25, 2015.In Taylor v. [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 9:21 pm
In Taylor v. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 4:15 am
"In formulating his ruling, Justice Devine noted the decision by the Appellate Division in Civil Service Employees Ass'n v New York State Public Employee Relations Board, 46 AD3d 1037, but concluded that the decision was not a controlling precedent in this case. [read post]