Search for: "Tenant v. State" Results 881 - 900 of 3,367
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Dec 2014, 1:50 am by Adam Burrage, Olswang LLP
The difficulty with this case arises from s 28(3)(a), which states that both valuations (mentioned above) are made on the basis that the landlord is selling his interest on the open market to a willing buyer. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 3:48 pm by NL
The District Judge’s order stated that the court found that Ms Boyle was and had been a secure tenant of the Highbury flat within the meaning of section 79 of the 1985 Act. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 3:48 pm by NL
The District Judge’s order stated that the court found that Ms Boyle was and had been a secure tenant of the Highbury flat within the meaning of section 79 of the 1985 Act. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 10:53 am by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
The trust is publicum juris, that is, for the whole People of the State (citing People v Grant, 306 NY 258; City of New York v Rice, 198 NY 124). [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 10:53 am by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
The trust is publicum juris, that is, for the whole People of the State (citing People v Grant, 306 NY 258; City of New York v Rice, 198 NY 124). [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 2:06 pm by Shahram Miri
The son argued that the property should be divided equally between the son and daughter, as stated in decedent's will. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 4:47 am by Siobhan Hayes
 It has ruled on what ‘repairs’ are but the judgment will not give many investors clarity over what their rates liability could be during refurbishment works.The case is Newbigin v S J and J Monk. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 4:47 am by Siobhan Hayes
 It has ruled on what ‘repairs’ are but the judgment will not give many investors clarity over what their rates liability could be during refurbishment works.The case is Newbigin v S J and J Monk. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 4:47 am by Siobhan Hayes
 It has ruled on what ‘repairs’ are but the judgment will not give many investors clarity over what their rates liability could be during refurbishment works.The case is Newbigin v S J and J Monk. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 6:17 pm by John Jascob
According to the complaint, the offering materials “favorably portrayed Phoenix’s business, emphasizing its focus on residents and customer service,” despite tenants complaints concerning “Phoenix’s practice of signing them up for bank loans without their knowledge or authorization and using the loan proceeds to fund its operations, while tenants unwittingly repaid the loans in monthly installments akin to rent. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 1:27 am
New York City Housing Authority Subscription Required NEW YORK COUNTY Landlord/Tenant Law Tenant States No Basis Why Landlord's Termination Notice Should Be Regarded as Unreasonable Monetti's Food Corp. v. 400 West 42nd Street Realty LLC Subscription Required NEW YORK COUNTY Landlord/Tenant Law Landlord Fails to Sustain Burden to Show Tenant Does Not Primarily Reside at Subject Premises Dixon Holdings LLC v. [read post]