Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Laws"
Results 881 - 900
of 55,019
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2024, 3:59 am
California, in which the Supreme Court held that laws imposing penalties on people for narcotics addiction violated the Eighth Amendment because they punished a state of being, not a specific action, like drug possession or sale. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 4:00 am
The only available legislative history states that the law at issue was amended in 1950 “to protect the health of the people. [read post]
23 Nov 2013, 2:31 pm
That traditional approach was liberalized by the New York Court of Appeals in the cases of People v Stone (1974) and People v Sugden (1974). [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 9:04 am
In Antonyuk v. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 10:33 am
The attitude behind this hard Brexit concept was reflected in Prime Minister Theresa May’s speech at the Conservative Party conference in late September: “[t]oo many people in positions of power behave as though they have more in common with international elites than with the people down the road, the people they employ, the people they pass in the street. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 8:55 am
Quinney College of Law) has posted Reproductive Justice at Work: Employment Law After Dobbs v. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 4:45 pm
But I do think she knew it was "wrong" to spit at other people and to kick them in the stomach? [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm
Wong Professor of Law at Cornell Law School. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 12:37 pm
But even before that, it was part of the common law. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 6:36 am
At a conference today in Laava v. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 8:35 am
The Court of Appeal ruled that the decision as to whether detention was lawful could only be impugned on traditional public law grounds, and it was not for the court to act as the primary decision maker. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 11:57 am
Marriott case, the Maryland Intermediate Appellate Court ruled that a person who falls on black ice has "assumed the risk" as a matter of law because people should know it can possibly be icy out after cold weather. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 8:35 am
The key case for constitutional law purposes is Santa Clara County v. [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 2:54 am
In Kunitsyna v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 12:37 pm
Anderson 87 Wash.L.Rev. 915 Full Article Inextricably Political: Race, Membership, and Tribal Sovereignty Sarah Krakoff 87 Wash.L.Rev. 1041 Full Article Indigenous Peoples and Epistemic Injustice: Science, Ethics, and Human Rights Rebecca Tsosie 87 Wash.L.Rev. 1133 Full Article Fleeing East from Indian Country: State v. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 1:30 am
On Saturday, we have two more health law sessions: “The State of the ACA after King v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 8:32 am
An uncomfortable truth: Law as a weapon of oppression of the Indigenous peoples of southern New England. [read post]
18 Mar 2023, 8:04 pm
What is the Texas law that punishes people who perform or assist with abortion? [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 12:53 pm
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 1:10 pm
(People v. [read post]
