Search for: "Trademark Cases"
Results 881 - 900
of 23,981
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
In some cases, a trademark registered and protected in its own right gained more robust protection through its incorporation into trade dress. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 1:58 pm
Wynndalco Enterprises LLC, Case No. 22-2313. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 10:04 am
” In a trademark case, it’s much less likely that this would be considered hearsay, but instead reporting mental state. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 8:40 am
The question has come up in a case, where the proprietor of an EU trademark considers that a sign used by a third party in online advertisements and online sales offers infringes that trademark. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 3:58 am
If that fails, you can take your case to the Chinese courts. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 3:27 am
It’s easier to get a trademark for it than to get it for one thing, and try to add it on later. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 11:40 pm
In fact, trademarks are often also expressive, containing hints to the relevant product’s origin or characteristics.... and Kat Daniel'sIn this case, the Court pointed to the fact that VIP had itself represented that it both owned and used the “Bad Spaniels’ trademark and trade dress” to “identify and distinguish” VIP’s products and indicate their source. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 12:39 pm
However, the case also alleges racketeering. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 11:20 am
To understand the case better it is important to remember that Poland joined the EU in 2004. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 8:32 am
The same is true even in trademark treaties. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 11:56 pm
In a recent opposition case, the Higher Regional Court Vienna (HRC), had the rare opportunity to shed some light on the scope of protection of the well-known trademark “PUMA” as against a similar mark applied for entirely dissimilar goods. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 11:56 pm
In a recent opposition case, the Higher Regional Court Vienna (HRC), had the rare opportunity to shed some light on the scope of protection of the well-known trademark “PUMA” as against a similar mark applied for entirely dissimilar goods. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
In Abitron Austria GmbH Hetronic International, Inc., the Court held that two provisions of the Lanham Act prohibiting trademark infringement apply only to domestic claims. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 4:51 pm
” In Passalacqua, the employer failed to meet its legal burden of proof, but its case weakened further when the employee presented counter-evidence. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 4:48 am
Though it may right now be acceptable not to register your trademark in China due to meager annual sales there, it’s crucial to keep an eye on your China sales in case the situation changes significantly in the future. [read post]
15 Jul 2023, 4:21 pm
The Forum for Humor and the Law (ForHum) comments on yet another trademark case taken up by the Supreme Court. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 5:15 pm
Judges in federal courts spend much of their time studying and ruling on issues involving federal questions like international trade, government contracts, patents, trademarks, and veterans’ benefits. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 2:43 pm
Terphogz’s attempt to dismiss the case in November 2021 for lack of personal jurisdiction and venue was denied. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 2:43 pm
Terphogz’s attempt to dismiss the case in November 2021 for lack of personal jurisdiction and venue was denied. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 12:45 pm
Patent and Trademark Office issues a final rule formalizing its Diversion Pilot Program and making other changes to agency practice; the Third Circuit affirms a default judgment for several litigation delays in a trademark case; Huawei announces that it earned $560 million in patent licensing revenues last year; the FTC announces an investigation into ChatGPT as FTC Chair Lina Khan faces tough questions at a House Judiciary Committee oversight hearing; and a settlement is… [read post]
