Search for: "Turner v. State"
Results 881 - 900
of 1,331
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2021, 4:02 pm
Consortum, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 12:56 pm
Turner v. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 12:56 pm
Turner v. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 10:33 am
Indeed, while under Article 52(1)(a) CTMR the application date is the seminal moment for the examination invalidity grounds, examiners and Courts are free to consider any material subsequent to the date of application insofar as it enables conclusions to be drawn with regard to the situation as it was on that date [see the CJEU’s orders in Alcon v OHIM, in Case C-192/03P, and Torresan v OHIM, in Case C-5/10]. [read post]
15 Jun 2018, 6:02 am
Turner, 142 So. 2d 335, 342 (Fla. 2d DCA 1962). [read post]
15 Jun 2018, 6:02 am
Turner, 142 So. 2d 335, 342 (Fla. 2d DCA 1962). [read post]
15 Jun 2018, 6:02 am
Turner, 142 So. 2d 335, 342 (Fla. 2d DCA 1962). [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 6:40 am
” See also United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2023, 11:37 am
State v. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 1:45 pm
Edited by Coby Turner [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 2:07 pm
” The “direct and material” requirement comes from Supreme Court precedent such as Turner Broadcasting v. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 4:55 am
Turner Const. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 9:00 am
In Turner v Rogers, the Court began from a premise it regarded as both legally significant and unquestionably true: that child support proceedings are civil. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 9:18 am
Viacom Int'l et al. v. [read post]
19 May 2014, 7:45 pm
Turner v. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 6:30 am
Tompkins that federal courts must apply state law in diversity cases as opposed to the Swift v. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 4:27 am
” At the ACS Blog, Bidish Sarma looks at Turner v. [read post]
7 May 2014, 6:45 am
Turner v. [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 4:59 pm
Natalie Orpett sat down with Saraphin Dhanani to discuss United States v. [read post]
[David Kopel] Ninth Circuit strikes California’s restrictive rule against licensed carry of handguns
13 Feb 2014, 10:17 am
The Ninth Circuit’s decision in Peruta v. [read post]
