Search for: "Turner v. Turner" Results 881 - 900 of 1,913
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jul 2007, 6:01 pm
 And there are times when the whistleblower gets nothing, even after going to the Supreme Court, as in the case of Rockwell v. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 7:54 am by Marvin Ammori
Second, if it's content-neutral, does it pass the judicial test set forth in Supreme Court cases decided in the 1990s pertaining to the relationship between cable and broadcast television, Turner Broadcasting v. [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 12:19 am by INFORRM
In reaching this conclusion, the Senior Master referred to: Campbell v MGN Ltd [2004] UKHL 22 at [132]; McKennitt v Ash [2008] QB 73 per Buxton LJ at [8]; Wainwright v The Home Office [2004] 2 AC 406 at [18]-[19] and [23], [43] and [62]  Perhaps unsurprisingly, the notion of a tort of physical intrusion privacy were given short shrift. [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 3:28 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” Because review of NAC’s liability insurance policies to determine their potential applicability to the judgment in the underlying action fell outside the scope of HSE’s engagement, the court properly granted HSE’s motion with respect to the professional negligence/legal malpractice cause of action against HSE insofar as asserted by NAC (see Turner v Irving Finkelstein & Meirowitz, LLP, 61 AD3d 849, 850 [2d Dept 2009]). [read post]
26 Aug 2018, 2:05 pm by Giles Peaker
These were signed by Mr Turner as the “Claimant’s …friend”. [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 10:21 am by Neil Wilkof
Reference was made to various cases, including Morison v Moat (1861) 68 ER 492, where Turner VC held that “the Court fastens the obligation on the conscience of the party, and enforces it against him”, and Smith Kline & French Laboratories v Secretary, Department of Community Services and Health (1990) 17 IPR 545, where Gummow J stated that “an obligation of conscience is to respect the confidence, not merely to refrain from causing detriment to the… [read post]