Search for: "U. S. v. Marks"
Results 881 - 900
of 1,323
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2024, 10:11 pm
S. 555, 561 (1992) (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 2:00 am
(Seattle Trademark Lawyer) US Trade Marks – Decisions District Court S D Texas: Yahoo’s sale of competitive keyword ads isn’t false designation of origin: Heartbrand Beef, Inc v Lobel’s of New York, LLC (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) (Rebecca Tushnet's 43(B)log) US Trade Marks – Lawsuits and strategic steps Jones Day – Jones Day,… [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 9:07 am
" Mark Lesh v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 4:53 am
Kupferman’s decision in Celia v Celia (2023 NY Slip Op 30995(U) [Sup Ct, Saratoga County Mar. 31, 2013]). [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 11:28 am
E.P., 196 N.J. 88, 104 (2008) (internal quotation marks omitted)). [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 12:33 pm
S. ___, ___ (2021) (per curiam) (slip op., at 6) (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 6:30 am
Roberts’s invocation of stare decisis per Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
15 Jan 2025, 7:15 am
S. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 2:44 pm
Coleman, 455 U. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 4:09 pm
U. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 11:16 am
We then address defendant's contention that the trial court should have granted his demurrer.State v. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 6:07 pm
Diaz v. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 4:18 am
U.S. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 1:37 pm
Milhollin, 444 U.S. 555, 568 (1980) (citation and quotation marks omitted). [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 4:18 am
U. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 12:16 am
Lo subrayamos porque tras la nueva Ley de Procedimiento Administrativo, el correo electrónico no es medio ni lugar de notificación según el art.43.1 Ley 39/15, de 1 de octubre:«Las notificaciones por medios electrónicos se practicarán mediante comparecencia en la sede electrónica de la Administración u Organismo actuante, a través de la dirección electrónica habilitada única o mediante ambos… [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 10:17 am
And they concluded that modern dormant Commerce Clause precedents rest on two primary principles that mark the boundaries of a state authority to regulate interstate commerce.[9] “First, state regulations may not discriminate against interstate commerce; and second, States may not impose undue burdens on interstate commerce. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 12:12 pm
U. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 9:51 am
TSDR 5470592 ABI GRAVEL GRADER TSDR 5466945 TSDR 5470347 TRANSFORMING MANUFACTURING IN AMERICA’SHEARTLAND TSDR 5470345 CLAZZIG TSDR 5464478 SHE’S SEW FANCY TSDR 5464437 JUST LOOK UP TSDR 5464424 L V N TSDR 5464329 NATIONAL REALTY GROUP TSDR 5464134 STEWARDS OF HORT TSDR 5464051 BIOSWEEP TSDR 5464010 CELEBRITY MACHINES TSDR 5463708 MAXIM’S FINEST TSDR 5463639 ITTY BITTY BEAD BUS TSDR 5463519 BAND MECHANIX TSDR 5463512 SHOES SO FRESH TSDR 5463439… [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 4:27 am
(See Aaron v Roemer. [read post]