Search for: "U.S. Direct Express" Results 881 - 900 of 9,627
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2007, 7:59 am
"Hectic Pace blog, Mar. 7; ALA TechSource blog, Mar. 7 U.S. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 10:29 pm
Scott to Bill Winders’ The Politics of Food Supply: U.S. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 9:51 am by Mary Whisner
”  Additionally, Doug Gardner, director of the Legislature's legal services division wrote a memo which expressed concern that the bill may not comply with U.S. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 8:36 am
Green Shades Software, Inc., whereby the U.S. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 6:49 pm
In unusually direct language, a panel of the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals criticized federal Immigration Judge Alan Vomacka for his handling of a claim for relief under the Convention Against Torture (CAT) by a man from Guyana who claimed his life would be in danger were he deported back to that country from the U.S. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 1:51 pm by Clif Burns
ANSI had filed a request for guidance with OFAC after a number of American companies, particularly those in the oil and gas industry, had expressed concern as to whether they could participate in the international standards process alongside Iranian companies. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 6:00 am by Jennifer M. Harris
The policy debate over the U.S. response seems to be heading in two, somewhat overlapping directions. [read post]
The EU, China, and the UK have expressed concerns about the newly initiated investigation and questioned the national security justification for tariffs. [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 1:09 pm
It is against this backdrop that the first-ever joining of the U.S. delegation to the OEIGWG meetings in 2022 was received with much interest. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 7:27 am
This "triple purpose" approach is important for Chinese policy objectives; but it may be missed by those states against which it is directed. [read post]
That is, unless you’re talking to the powerful political lobbyist, the U.S. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 8:09 am by Scott R. Anderson
Section 1243 would express the sense of Congress that “the United States is legally entitled to suspend the operation of the INF Treaty in whole or in part for so long as the Russian Federation continues to be in material breach” and, pursuant to this view, would direct the secretary of defense to initiate a “program of record” for the development of INF-related countermeasures as well as a separate U.S. [read post]