Search for: "U.S. v. Pena*" Results 881 - 900 of 9,151
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 May 2020, 12:10 pm by Comunicaciones_MJ
United States, 483 U.S. 350) ha concluido que el esquema debe tener como objetivo (Cleveland v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 12:06 pm
 It's also yet another example of how mandatory minimums can be used in charging decisions by the relevant authorities to leverage heavy penalties (and/or plea deals). [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 1:57 pm
 Well, in an extreme case, the penalty is . . . a prefiling order that stops you from doing it again. [read post]
9 May 2018, 12:15 pm
  It's a federal death penalty case, which is rare, so one can understand why the panel's opinion is so detailed. [read post]
16 May 2018, 1:57 pm
Not because there's a circuit split, or it's a death penalty case, or anything like that. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 3:37 pm
 The other result is a victory for giving totally nonresponsive answers, even under penalty of perjury. [read post]