Search for: "U.S. v. Taylor*"
Results 881 - 900
of 1,433
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Nov 2010, 9:04 am
Judge Adalberto Jordan, U.S. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 4:10 am
Randolph v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 1:14 pm
The U.S. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 5:17 am
Manhattan U.S. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 5:17 am
Manhattan U.S. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 8:24 am
Rosen’s article The Judge Advocate General’s School, U.S. [read post]
12 Aug 2012, 12:01 pm
Gabrielle Giffords, U.S. [read post]
12 Aug 2012, 8:56 am
Gabrielle Giffords, U.S. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 6:13 am
Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition (forthcoming) Petitioners’ reply (forthcoming) Amicus brief of U.S. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 9:31 am
The U.S. [read post]
21 May 2008, 11:05 pm
In Lopez v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 10:00 am
In Dougherty v. [read post]
9 Apr 2011, 3:48 pm
See Nobelman v. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm
The U.S. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
Harris and KBR v. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 8:00 am
Even after the Court’s twisted opinion in Supreme Beef v. [read post]