Search for: "United States v. Adam" Results 881 - 900 of 2,881
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2018, 12:33 pm by Kevin
This is kind of ridiculous even without the Roman numerals (though I could give you about XCIV reasons why you shouldn’t go above V with those). [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 4:19 am by Edith Roberts
United States and Hughes v. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 6:00 am by Ed Stein
(As discussed in an earlier post, some argue that the review provision runs afoul of Immigration and Naturalization Service v. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 8:53 am by Goldfinger Injury Lawyers
The lives of: Parker Tobin, Darcy Haugan, Stephen Wack, Logan Boulet, Brody Hinz, Evan Thomas, Mark Cross, Logan Schatz, Adam Herold, Tyler Bieber, Glen Doerksen, Jaxon Joseph, Jacob Leicht, Logan Hunter and Conner Lukan all cut too short. 14 others who were on the bus were injured. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
Constitution Daily reports that “[o]ne of the most-significant cases of the Supreme Court’s current term,” United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 4:36 am by Edith Roberts
Lundgren, in which the justices considered tribal immunity from state-court actions to adjudicate title to land, and United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 4:33 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which involves how to determine the precedential effect of Supreme Court decisions with no majority opinion, for this blog. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 4:00 am by Steve Vladeck
For example, the Tillis-Coons bill (the “Special Counsel Integrity Act”) already provides that “An action filed under this subsection shall be heard and determined by a court of 3 judges not later than 14 days after the date on which the action is filed in accordance with the provisions of section 2284 of title 28, United States Code, and any appeal shall lie to the Supreme Court. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 11:08 am by Barbara E. Lichman, Ph.D., J.D.
Because the Federal Aviation Administration’s (“FAA’) airspace redesign projects throughout the United States have apparently negatively impacted hundreds of thousands, even millions, of people, and because we have received a number of requests for a discussion of the bases for the currently pending challenge to the FAA’s SoCal Metroplex airspace redesign project, a copy of the Opening Brief of Petitioners City of Culver City, California; Santa Monica Canyon… [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 3:08 am by Barbara E. Lichman, Ph.D., J.D.
Because the Federal Aviation Administration’s (“FAA’) airspace redesign projects throughout the United States have apparently negatively impacted hundreds of thousands, even millions, of people, and because we have received a number of requests for a discussion of the bases for the currently pending challenge to the FAA’s SoCal Metroplex airspace redesign project, a copy of the Opening Brief of Petitioners City of Culver City, California; Santa Monica Canyon… [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 4:31 am by Edith Roberts
The first is United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
United States, the court held 7-2 that to convict a defendant of impeding the administration of the tax code, the government must prove that the defendant knew of or could have foreseen a tax-related proceeding. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 7:31 pm by Anthony Gaughan
I’m teaching insurance law this semester and yesterday the United States Supreme Court heard oral argument in a very interesting insurance case out of Minnesota, Sveen v. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 3:55 am by Edith Roberts
Palestine Liberation Organization, a lawsuit filed by American families and victims of terrorist attacks in Israel, arguing that “the Department of Justice’s refusal to defend an act of Congress specifically designed to protect United States citizens should be reconsidered at the highest levels of the Trump administration. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 4:32 am by Edith Roberts
City of Riviera Beach, Florida, United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 3:50 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Here, plaintiff has presented evidence of a “continuing wrong,” which is “deemed to have accrued on the date of the last wrongful act” (Leonhard v United States, 633 F2d 599, 613 [2d Cir 1980], cert denied 451 US 908 [1981]; Harvey, 34 AD3d at 364). [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 4:34 am by Edith Roberts
United States, a securities-fraud case that they argue “represents yet another example of the overcriminalization that has run rampant throughout our legal system. [read post]
11 Mar 2018, 5:30 pm by INFORRM
The Socially Aware blog has commented on the case of United States v. [read post]