Search for: "United States v. Borders"
Results 881 - 900
of 3,812
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 May 2019, 8:11 am
United States, 18-7739. [read post]
30 May 2017, 8:30 am
In his Proclamation 5517 (1986), he justified this exclusion on the ground that he “found that the unrestricted entry into the United States as immigrants by Cuban citizens would . . . be detrimental to the interests of the United States. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 7:31 am
THE CAPTAIN REPORTS: ELECTION DAY 2016 ...............PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES .......DONALD TRUMP ELECTED AS THE 45TH PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATESHistoric, unprecedented, shocking, and clearly the biggest upset in American political history. [read post]
18 May 2023, 4:24 pm
The justices sent the case, Arizona v. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 1:19 pm
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit—ultimately ruled in his favor in United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 5:00 am
United States, 135 S. [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 8:47 am
United States: When the United States Supreme Court quotes you in upholding privacy, that’s a big win. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:00 am
Finally, Title 10 status occurs when state National Guard units are “federalized” by the president of the United States pursuant to one of the statutory authorities for doing so. [read post]
23 Nov 2019, 6:00 am
Last week, in Alasaad v. [read post]
1 Dec 2007, 10:20 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2017, 1:45 pm
In U.S. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 3:56 pm
Earlier today, I submitted an amicus brief to the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas in Texas v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 10:10 am
(argued April 16, 2018): U.S. laws generally apply only to conduct that happens in the United States. [read post]
10 May 2018, 9:37 am
Unlike in Valentine, Doe was picked up outside the United States (and in the context of armed conflict). [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 4:00 am
Last month, the United States Supreme Court held in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 12:23 pm
u='+encodeURIComponent(u)+'&t='+encodeURIComponent(t),'sharer','toolbar=0,status=0,width=626,height=436');return false;} html .fb_share_button { display: -moz-inline-block; display:inline-block; padding:1px 20px 0 5px; height:15px; border:1px solid #d8dfea; background:url(http://static.ak.fbcdn.net/rsrc.php/zAB5S/hash/4273uaqa.gif) no-repeat top right; } html .fb_share_button:hover { color:#fff; border-color:#295582; background:#3b5998… [read post]
29 Aug 2024, 7:47 am
Article 3 (scope) and Chapter V (cross border transfers) of GDPR coexist and can apply together. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 5:00 am
Participating as an amicus, the United States adds one more argument worth mentioning. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 9:05 am
Buchanan v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 10:46 am
Constitution which provides that, “The United States shall … protect each [state] against invasion. [read post]
