Search for: "United States v. Choice"
Results 881 - 900
of 6,597
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2018, 11:28 am
As a matter of principle, Part I could be excluded if, on facts, the juridical seat is outside India or the law governing the arbitration agreement is a law other than Indian law , as was held in Union of India v. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm
Because of these selfish motives, states are unlikely to move away from WTA unless they are legally required to do so.To say that WTA is a rational selfish choice for each state is not, of course, to say that it is permissible under the US Constitution and federal law. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm
But in a recent ruling, in Sessions v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 7:52 am
But it's also a reminder to not expect too much of United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 10:09 am
(The United States takes no position on the second issue.) [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 5:38 am
Although ICJ decisions lack formal precedential effect, I agree with Jamshidi that the ICJ’s decision in Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. [read post]
14 May 2008, 7:51 am
United States (1991)), but parties must consent to the delegation. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 12:26 pm
” Importantly, in State v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
InterDigital Commc’ns v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 7:11 am
Plyler v. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 3:06 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 5:00 pm
Obama, President of the United States, et al. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 4:40 pm
The case of Yvietta Matison v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 3:47 am
Even the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals, masters of their domain when it comes to keeping drug dealers convicted and imprisoned, will jump as high as need be to appease the grocery clerk.Consider what happened in United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 4:15 pm
To apply United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 5:00 pm
Employer and union sponsored group health plans covered by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) and their insurers are not required to comply with a Vermont state law that requires health insurers and certain other parties to report payments relating to health care claims and other information relating to health care services to a state agency for compilation in an all-inclusive health care database, according to the United States Supreme… [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 8:24 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
Fund, Inc. v Gantt, 796 F Supp 681, 684 [ED NY 1992]). [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
Fund, Inc. v Gantt, 796 F Supp 681, 684 [ED NY 1992]). [read post]
6 May 2010, 7:38 am
“This case,” Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said, “has Australia written all over it….Isn’t the most appropriate choice of law that of Australia, not the United States? [read post]
