Search for: "United States v. Choice" Results 881 - 900 of 6,472
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2008, 7:51 am
United States (1991)), but parties must consent to the delegation. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 5:38 am by William S. Dodge
Although ICJ decisions lack formal precedential effect, I agree with Jamshidi that the ICJ’s decision in Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 7:38 am by Charles Kotuby
“This case,” Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said, “has Australia written all over it….Isn’t the most appropriate choice of law that of Australia, not the United States? [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:58 am by MBettman
State, 2018-Ohio-2358 (The General Assembly has authority to enact any law that is not prohibited by the Ohio or United States Constitutions.) [read post]
10 May 2011, 3:47 am by SHG
  Even the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals, masters of their domain when it comes to keeping drug dealers convicted and imprisoned, will jump as high as need be to appease the grocery clerk.Consider what happened in United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2019, 3:28 am by SHG
United States, Justice Elena Kagan might be right that “most of Government is unconstitutional. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 2:47 pm by Brian Clarke
United States, 98 U.S. (8 Otto.) 145 (1878) (same)). [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 12:03 pm by Jo-Ann Wallace
  As amicus in the case, The National Legal Aid & Defender Association (NLADA) argued that when the private interest at stake is someone’s personal liberty counsel should be made available to the alleged contemnor in all instances, as is currently the case in a majority of jurisdictions in the United States. [read post]
  On Tuesday I attended a hearing called by the US Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions to examine women’s freedoms, focusing on access to abortions across the United States two years after the overturning of Roe v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 5:00 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Employer and union sponsored group health plans covered by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) and their insurers are not required to comply with a Vermont state law that requires health insurers and certain other parties to report payments relating to health care claims and other information relating to health care services to a state agency for compilation in an all-inclusive health care database, according to the United States Supreme… [read post]