Search for: "United States v. Holder"
Results 881 - 900
of 4,280
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Oct 2019, 12:01 pm
Koh of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California to bar within a matter of hours--ex parte, i.e., without a hearing--Avanci, Nokia, Sharp, Conversant (which has very recently become the third and latest Avanci member to sue Daimler for patent infringement, as I reported earlier today), and Optis from seeking another AAII against Continental in Germany.Today's TRO motion renews the original pursuit of a U.S. antisuit injunction against those… [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 5:29 am
In a recent decision, Oxford University Bank v. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 12:37 am
Since our client resided in Medina, OH, her application had a better chance compared to states under the 9th Circuit (see Momeni v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
Ramos v. [read post]
28 Sep 2019, 10:01 am
Facts: This case (Woods v. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 1:26 pm
United States Department of Homeland Security will take place. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 12:16 pm
The United States Courts of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has always been viewed as being more sympathetic to patent holders than to alleged infringers--but not in every single aspect of patent law. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 10:37 am
SPLC’s Hate Map [and other ‘hate group’ materials, goods, and services] reach a large number of people in every state in the United States and beyond. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 4:30 am
” Copyright Litigation Handbook § 9:9 (Motions to dismiss for failure to state a claim ) (2010). [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 2:10 am
Oswin Ridderbusch and Alexa von UexküllOne of the features that render the European Union’s Supplementary Protection Certificate (SPC) unique in comparison to similar legal instruments in other jurisdictions, including the United States and Japan, is that there is no legal provision expressly calling for any specific relationship or agreement between the patent proprietor (and SPC applicant) on the one hand, and the holder of the marketing authorization relied… [read post]
14 Sep 2019, 7:03 am
Tillis's efforts to distance himself from (at least) the proposed overruling of the eBay v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 9:00 am
It contravenes the duly enacted substantive law of the United States. [read post]
8 Sep 2019, 8:17 pm
The "victim" (not any rights holder) is the ideological centerpiece of the DLBI. [read post]
7 Sep 2019, 8:15 am
Holder, in which, standing was granted to United States citizens who believed they were on the “no fly list” and showed that they could reasonably expect to encounter difficulties the next time they tried to board a plane. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 4:00 pm
For those not within the United States, some individuals with substantial connections to the United States may have some protection. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 1:06 pm
Meanwhile, in the United States, litigation rages on against Mark Karpeles, the President and CEO of Mt. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 1:01 am
The City of Los Angeles, the State of California, indeed the United States of America had all been changed by his life, in ways both subtle and dramatic. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 9:36 am
And even if nobody raised that issue here because everyone believes it's more conservative to just stick to Aspen (a shoe that can fit, but doesn't fit like a glove), there will be other cases down the road, involving either Qualcomm or other SEP holders, such as that Continental v. [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 6:41 am
Frank-Erich Hufnagel argued that any concerns in Germany over the United States (as a jurisdiction) violating international law through the grant of antisuit injunctions would have to be addressed at the diplomatic level, with the Federal Republic of Germany, represented by its government, holding talks with the United States. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 2:39 pm
A substantial number of unauthorized immigrants sought asylum in the United States, claiming as a defense to removal under the U.S. [read post]
