Search for: "United States v. King"
Results 881 - 900
of 2,976
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Nov 2012, 6:30 am
United Virginia Bank, 243 Va. 94, 110 (1992). [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 7:15 pm
The petition of the day is: King Cole Foods, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 7:40 pm
It was in that context that Carswell, J., stated: Therefore, section 211 of the Surrogate's Court Act is not applicable to or binding upon the United States. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 6:48 pm
It was in that context that Carswell, J., stated: Therefore, section 211 of the Surrogate's Court Act is not applicable to or binding upon the United States. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 8:56 pm
In doing so, the court held there was no clear inconsistency with its precedents allowing a defendant in a copyright infringement action to claim the "first sale doctrine" as a defense only where the disputed copies of a copyrighted work were either made or previously sold in the United States with the authority of the copyright owner, and the Supreme Court's decision in Quality King Distributors, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 12:23 am
United States
Subscription Required
U.S. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 12:37 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITCriminal Practice
Court's Reliance on Record, Including Presentence Report, Was Adequate Basis for Imposed Sentence
United States v. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 1:39 am
DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Criminal Practice Cocaine, Crack Distribution Conspirator's Sentence Reduced to 240-Month Mandatory Minimum Term United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:25 pm
Einer Elhauge is the Petrie Professor of Law at Harvard Law School My major takeaways from the Supreme Court’s opinion in King v. [read post]
6 Dec 2006, 12:36 am
United States Department of Defense U.S. [read post]
2 May 2011, 8:04 am
We've previously reported on the numerous orders entered by Judge King finding various banks' arbitration clauses to be unconscionable.Those orders are now highly suspect in light of the Supreme Court's Concepcion opinion last week.Already the 11th Circuit has vacated at least five of these orders:After oral argument in this case, the United States Supreme Court decided AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 8:30 am
ESRT Empire State Building, LLC v. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 8:20 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2007, 12:21 am
United States U.S. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 9:40 am
In Quality King Distribs., Inc. v. [read post]
12 May 2015, 2:47 pm
The Facts of the Case In the recent case of King v. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 5:00 pm
The Washington Supreme Court's decision in Bylsma v. [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 12:20 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITCriminal PracticeImpersonation, Tax Evasion Sentence Upheld; 'Sharp Practice' Not Due Process Violation United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 4:42 am
At Wired, David Kravets examines the Fourth Circuit’s recent decision holding that impersonating a police officer is not speech protected under the First Amendment in light of the Court’s recent holding in United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2008, 12:34 pm
United States v. [read post]
