Search for: "United States v. Line Material Co." Results 881 - 900 of 971
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2012, 2:24 am by Giesela Ruehl
In line with art. 3 of directive 2001/24/EC, the district court held that the administrative or judicial authorities of the home member state of a credit institution are alone competent to decide on implementation measures for a credit institution, including branches established in other member states. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 3:58 am by Fred Rocafort
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the equivalent state level agencies. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 12:42 am
A terrible joke for a serious issue that has plagued the US farming community and US courts for years – most recently in an appeal from the Southern District of Indiana to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ("CAFC") in the case of Monsanto v Bowman. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 7:07 am by Charles Johnson
Your case will mostly be affected by recent published opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit and the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 1:00 pm by Benjamin Wittes
 I understand that the Harvard National Security Journal is a co-host for this talk, and I thank the Journal as well for this opportunity. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 3:50 am by Kevin LaCroix
 Moreover, the typically de minimus ransomware payment demands (on average, about $679) are more akin to a financial nuisance than a material fiscal line-item, so from a cost-benefit perspective, payment can make the most sense. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 6:42 pm by Stephen Page
”[2] G v H (1994) A good starting point in discussing the issue of who is a parent is G v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 6:42 pm by Stephen Page
”[2] G v H (1994) A good starting point in discussing the issue of who is a parent is G v. [read post]
9 Oct 2006, 5:12 pm
The Board further found that the lead persons were held accountable for the performance of their crew or line members. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 7:05 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
The controversy was a prime case to examine whether Islamic law and liberal democracy can co-exist within a liberal constitutional framework. [read post]