Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 881 - 900
of 10,388
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2019, 12:11 am
Case date: 20 November 2019 Case number: No. 19-1017 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 3:21 am
The Board found that the phrase is a common expression of patriotism, affection, or affiliation with the United States of America that will not be perceived as a source indicator. [read post]
19 Oct 2014, 8:06 pm
Likewise there is an almost obsessive interest in patent litigation in the United States, where the subject lies somewhere between a cottage industry and an art form, with ever-shifting guidance concerning injunctions, damages, patent eligibility and the interrelationship of patent suits with the sale price of patents singly or in bundles. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 2:32 am
Mere Descriptiveness: Both Opposers testified that they escaped from Cuba to the United States in a program organized by the United States government and dubbed "Operation Pedro Pan. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 2:29 pm
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) rejected Elster’s proposed mark, reasoning that 15 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 7:48 am
In Trump v. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 6:43 am
”) United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 3:43 pm
” Vidal v. [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 12:11 am
Per United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 11:46 am
Although the United States appealed both the ruling on Mr. [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 2:14 pm
Sure, an intrastate user may oppose under Section 2(d), but at least it is "using" its mark in the United States. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 6:29 pm
Recently HEATHCOTE HOLDINGS CORP, INC filed a complaint (.PDF) claiming false patent marking against CRAYOLA LLC in the United States District Court in the Northern District of Illinois. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 9:35 am
Gitter v. [read post]
6 May 2009, 8:20 am
Respondent also sells flowers, as a wholesaler of fresh cut flowers for the United States market. [read post]
22 May 2018, 11:13 am
United States, 135 S. [read post]
4 Dec 2015, 11:11 am
This post draws upon an article forthcoming in the Virginia Law Review The Second Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 3:51 am
The Board found opposer's mark MAPPIN & WEBB to be inherently distinctive, but having "little, if any, marketplace strength in the United States. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 3:40 pm
The Court in Eckard relied on the 1990 United States Supreme Court case of Maryland v. [read post]
17 May 2013, 10:56 am
Redpath, and Owen Mark Williams Case number: 10-cv-03995 (United States District Court for the District of Minnesota)Case filed: September 21, 2010Qualifying Judgment/Order: April 15, 2013 5/17/2013 8/15/2013 2013-40 SEC v. [read post]
