Search for: "United States v. Marks"
Results 881 - 900
of 9,483
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2012, 6:00 am
The panel consisted of United States District Court Judge J. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 2:40 am
Fargo disclosed the use of a low frequency (LF) RFID tag, but stated this was only an example and noted that a more powerful (high frequency (HF)) tag could be used. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 4:37 am
United States, a double jeopardy case, comes from Rory Little for this blog. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 2:17 am
The Complainant in Streetwise Maps located in the United States (Florida) alleges that Respondent (located in the U.K.) is a competitor in the market it serves. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 9:59 pm
KAHN CLERK [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 07-15329 D.C. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 11:27 am
”) State of Ohio v. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 8:46 am
United States (“Microsoft”) by the U.S. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 10:48 am
Shizzle Pop, LLC v. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 5:31 pm
Tauxe, MDa and Mark J. [read post]
22 May 2014, 10:30 am
This marks the most significant among many dates set by the Second Amended Scheduling Order, in the military commission case of United States v. [read post]
17 May 2007, 11:09 am
Today marks the 53rd anniversary of Brown v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 5:23 am
Sarmiento and Sharpston view Zambrano (C-34/09, EU:C:2011:124), which caused a stir because of the substance of rights test, as a “high-water mark” in the CJEU’s jurisprudence. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 2:40 am
Olin Corp. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
Reversing theDistrict Court’s operative holding, the majority concludedthat for purposes of Section 3, the Presidency is an officeunder the United States and the President is an officer ofthe United States. [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 9:03 am
At issue in Weyerhaeuser Company v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 6:30 am
Recent United States Supreme Court decisions, such as Shelley v. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 3:48 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 5:01 am
An excerpt: When acting within its territorial boundaries and with respect to internal matters, an Indian Nation retains the sovereignty it enjoyed prior to the adoption of the United States Constitution except to the extent that its sovereignty has been abrogated or curtailed by Congress (see Montana v United States, 450 US 544, 564; United States v Kagama, 118 US 375, 381-382; Cayuga Nation v Campbell, 34… [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 4:00 am
The Supreme Court endorsed the unenumerated principle in the appropriately named case of United States v. [read post]
23 May 2018, 5:58 am
” Watt, 50 M.J. at 105 (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting United States v. [read post]
