Search for: "United States v. Oregon" Results 881 - 900 of 1,608
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Oct 2013, 2:45 pm by Dale Carpenter
Undoubtedly the state DOJ was influenced by United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 8:59 am by Eric P. Robinson
  In the United States, the Supreme Court has held that government may not enact taxes or other financial measures that specifically aimed at shutting shown speech (see, e.g., Grosjean v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
  We found a lot of cases – at least something useful from 42 jurisdictions:  all except Delaware, Hawaii, Maine, Nebraska, New Mexico, Oregon, Puerto Rico, Rhode Island, South Dakota, and Wisconsin.As alluded to earlier, plaintiffs sometimes try to overcome inconvenient facts about a failure to read warnings with quirky arguments that the defendant should have communicated in a different fashion. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 4:39 am
  As it also explains, most state courts in the United States are courts of “general” jurisdiction, which means they can hear “any case over which no other tribunal has exclusive jurisdiction. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 11:10 am
United States (Alvarez Machain II), 266 F.3d 1045 (9th Cir. 2001). [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 1:45 pm by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
Prior to assuming the role of Chief Judge, Judge Aiken launched the District of Oregon’s Reentry Court—one of the first in the United States. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 9:28 am by Gene Quinn
The ALJ concluded that complainant has failed to show that a domestic industry exists in the United States that exploits the asserted patents as required by 19 U.S.C. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 10:03 pm by Daniel B. Cohen
” Most of the surface waters of the United States will fail the generic E. coli standard either persistently, predictably during certain times of the year or intermittently. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 5:18 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) explains: In many Latin American countries, the term “notario publico” (for “notary public”) stands for something very different than what it means in the United States. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 7:00 am by Ryan Gibson
  Careful and appropriate use of criminal history information is an important, and in many cases essential, part of the employment process of employers throughout the United States * * *. [read post]