Search for: "United States v. Reading Co." Results 881 - 900 of 5,345
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 May 2022, 10:38 am by Holly Brezee
The pending appeal before the Supreme court of the United States is styled Susan K. [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 9:25 am by Eleonora Rosati
This has more recently been reaffirmed by the United States Supreme Court in Deepsouth Packing Co. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
”To complicate matters, however, a federal statute appears to delegate to the Archivist of the United States the power to decide whether an amendment is valid. [read post]
23 Mar 2021, 9:00 pm by Samuel Estreicher and Julian Ku
Instead, Chief Justice Roberts emphasized that “United States Law…does not rule the world,” a phrase he first used in his opinion for the Court in Kiobel v. [read post]
14 Apr 2022, 12:43 pm by Andrea DeField and S. Alice Weeks
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., 35 So. 3d 893 (Fla. 2010) that an excess judgment can be presented in the form of not only a verdict rendered after a trial, but also in the form of a Cunningham agreement, a Coblentz agreement or a claim by an excess carrier against a primary carrier based on failure to settle. [read post]
16 May 2017, 5:42 pm by Steven Boutwell
By Lauren Rucinski On May 4, 2017, Momentive Performance Materials Silicones, LLC (“MPM”) agreed to a settlement with the United States, on behalf of the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”), and the State of New York, that requires MPM to pay $1.5 million in fines. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 5:07 am by Charles Sartain
Co-author Ethan Wood We told you to “Beware of Strips and Gores” back in 2012 and today we bring you Green et al v. [read post]
7 Sep 2021, 7:05 am by David Klein
The proverbial battle of David versus Goliath is currently unfolding in United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 4:08 pm by Mary Love and Devin Ricci
The United States Copyright Office (“USCO”) denied the application because the work “lack[ed] the human authorship necessary to support a copyright claim. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 5:30 am
 It explained that The conspiracy statute under which the jury convicted Leitner criminalizes conspiracies to either: (1) commit any offense against the United States; or (2) defraud the United States. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 12:23 pm by Jason Starling
By Jason Starling In what looks to be an ominous development for public-sector unions, the United States Supreme Court, on June 30, 2015, granted a petition for certiorari by the plaintiffs in Friedrichs v. [read post]