Search for: "United States v. Rogers" Results 881 - 900 of 1,642
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2021, 2:56 am by INFORRM
Sullivan Ohio State Law Journal, Forthcoming, Roger Williams Univ. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 7:47 am
The United States had agreed to comply with the ICJ as its obligation under an international treaty. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 10:25 am by The Charge
United States, WL 2368661 (2012) (Scalia, J. dissenting) (citing and quoting Hinderlider v. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 4:00 am by Josh Blackman
In the Barnett/Blackman constitutional law casebook, we included this introduction to United States v. [read post]
28 Dec 2019, 9:51 pm by Guest
By 1941, the pro-New Deal Court took this line, saying in United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2023, 6:04 pm by Hyland Hunt
The United States Citizenship and Immigration Services had denied a doctor’s application to adjust his status to a lawful permanent resident, finding him ineligible. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Had one looked at this issue in 1921, the United States would have had company: At that time, Australia and Canada, countries that, like the United States, were influenced by the British tradition, provided judges with indefinite tenure during good behavior.[3]However, each of these countries amended their constitutions and adopted mandatory retirement ages for their federal judges later in the 20thcentury – 70 in Australia, 75 in Canada. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 4:39 am by Amy Howe
” At Constitutional Law Prof Blog, Ruthann Robson notes that judges in several lower courts have relied on Justice Scalia’s dissent in United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 1:46 am by Marie Louise
Rogers Communications Inc (Michael Geist)   Czech Republic Pirate Party launches ‘Facebook’ for movies (TorrentFreak)   Germany Apple wins (again) in Germany: Galaxy Tab 10.1 injunction upheld (FOSS Patents) (FOSS Patents) (Class 99) Samsung’s German lawyer agrees with Apple on the purpose of patent enforcement (FOSS Patents) Cologne Regional Court rules ISP not responsible when subscribers infringe copyrights in dispute between EMI and ISP HanseNet… [read post]
24 Oct 2015, 5:32 am by Elina Saxena
” He then explained how standing issues complicate the United States’ potential to accommodate European demands for judicial redress for data collection. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 5:49 am
In a rare, contested concurrent use proceeding, the Board awarded junior user ABF concurrent use registrations for the three marks shown below, for hotel and motel services, in the entire United States except for the State of Arizona. [read post]
9 Jun 2006, 5:49 am by Tobias Thienel
United Kingdom, at paras. 46-49; repeated in Kalogeropoulou and Others v. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
United States, the court ruled 7-0 (without the participation of Justice Elena Kagan) that the advisory federal sentencing guidelines are not subject to vagueness challenges under the due process clause. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by David Kris
Wiretap Act (also known as Title III) prohibits the interception of a live communication (e.g., a telephone call) only if the interception occurs in the United States; it does not prohibit or regulate wiretaps (interception) conducted abroad.[8]  Similarly, the U.S. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 1:46 pm by Kent Scheidegger
They seek a judicial order that would require their release from custody into the United States. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 2:30 pm by Jane Chong
” That process unfolds as follows: the Attorney General may (and reliably does) oppose the request for disclosure by filing an affidavit stating that the disclosure “would harm the national security of the United States,” per 50 U.S.C. [read post]