Search for: "VENUS v. UNITED STATES"
Results 881 - 900
of 1,567
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2015, 3:44 pm
” In support of his submission that the President has broad, undefined powers over foreign affairs, the Secretary quotes United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 11:15 pm
Just imagine how many people--outside of its own organization and apart from its shareholders--Qualcomm would make happy with such an involuntary gift...One of the reasons for which Qualcomm wants the United States Court of Appeal for the Ninth Circuit to overturn Judge Koh's class certification is plain feasibility. [read post]
28 Oct 2018, 11:03 am
All salvaged with a Herring aid.United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2022, 6:43 am
That makes sense.At the same time, Pfizer and BioNTech have made a strategically very smart move, too:With its narrative that portrays CureVac as a sore loser (without using that term), the complaint is directed not only at the court of law (and the jury to be selected further down the road) but also at the court of public opinion.Pfizer is headquartered in New York but has a home-field advantage anywhere in the United States, and BioNTech has one of its two U.S. offices in the Bay… [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 3:51 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 2:34 pm
In K-Tech Telecommunications v. [read post]
19 Sep 2020, 8:29 am
First up: the state-court case of Shahrokh Mireskandari v. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 4:41 am
The first was County of Los Angeles v. [read post]
2 Oct 2022, 4:55 pm
See United States ex rel. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 3:10 am
The United States Patent and Trademark Office has just been reportedly faced with a case of alleged nepotism on the part of one of its Commissioners, the outcome being reported by the Washington Times (here, with a katpat to Chris Torrero for the link). [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 5:08 am
It will keep trying, but realistically it won't be able to force Apple into a settlement before some key antitrust, contract and patent exhaustion questions are resolved in the United States.I will soon write in a separate post about Munich as a patent litigation venue. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 9:01 pm
In the 2021 case of United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 9:23 am
But in this Nokia v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 8:32 pm
Generally speaking, estoppel cannot be used against a state or municipal government (see e.g., New York State Medical Transporters Association v. [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 10:11 pm
Ford and Acer v. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 8:53 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Sierra Club v. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 1:07 am
On Tuesday, there'll be an interesting Ericsson v. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 8:25 pm
(PatLit) United States US General USPTO launches websites to discuss patent and trademark procedures (inovia) US Patent Reform Will patent reform come up in a big way in the 112th Congress? [read post]
24 Jul 2007, 4:58 am
United States v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 5:00 am
Generally, government employees are immune from discovery in private litigation under rules first set out in United States ex rel. [read post]
