Search for: "Wells v. Justice Court" Results 881 - 900 of 29,678
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jul 2012, 5:59 am by Jasmine Sweatman
Summary: It is not often that the courts deal with charity related cases but this latest decision of Justice Beaudoin 2011 ONSC 6801 (CANLII) and 2011 ONSC 5684 (CANLII), confirms that when it comes to costs; the same rules apply. [read post]
21 May 2018, 2:16 pm by Andrew Hamm
” Marty ended up convincing the two other judges on that panel, as well as the Supreme Court, but not Friendly — who Marty secretly knew “had it right. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 9:35 pm by Howard Wasserman
Well, according to Slate's Mark Joseph Stern, Tuesday's opinion in Sessions v. [read post]
28 Jun 2008, 12:19 pm
At a practical level, what does the Supreme Court of Canada's decision in Keays v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 10:01 am by Steve Hall
But too often that duty, as laid out by the 1963 Supreme Court decision Brady v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 11:33 pm
The Supreme Court’s refusal to review the Federal Circuit’s dangerous decision in Oracle v. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 2:35 pm by Adam Feldman
The following chart breaks down the justices’ separate opinion totals (the opinions they joined as well as authored) by opinion type. [read post]
7 Dec 2007, 7:58 am
Supreme Court granted the State's cert. petition in Indiana v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 10:41 am by Ilya Somin
(Ilya Somin) The Supreme Court today issued a unanimous decision in favor of the property owners in the important case of Sackett v. [read post]
14 Jan 2025, 4:57 pm by Ronald Mann
McGill’s brief argued that a jurisdictional problem (based on the court’s decision in Badgerow v. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 12:30 pm
Though Justice Werdegar coyly abbreviates the term there as "m__________r".Then, today, there's People v. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 3:32 pm by Sambhav Sankar
The court had already held in West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 8:14 am by Amy Howe
The Redskins had urged the justices, if they were to grant review in Tam, to take on their case as well, even before a federal appeals court could weigh in. [read post]