Search for: "Wells v. Madison" Results 881 - 900 of 1,326
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Aug 2012, 10:39 am by Adam White
Justifying (but limiting) judicial review That we think of Bickel today as a proponent of judicial restraint is somewhat ironic, given that The Least Dangerous Branch was a defense of judicial action – specifically, the Court’s then-controversial decision to end racial segregation in Brown v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 7:25 am by Floyd Abrams
 For me, rereading The Least Dangerous Branch (TLDB) is to return my first days in Yale Law School – and Alex Bickel’s first days as well. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 1:13 pm by Kathryn Watts
Bickel may well be right that it would be very difficult, and perhaps counterproductive or ill-advised, to try to more carefully delineate specific legal concepts to govern the Court’s certiorari decisions. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 8:01 am by Michael Seidman
Gore (2000) and may well have handed it to Mitt Romney in Citizens United v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 12:41 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Well-known in tort law. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 9:19 am by Charles Fried
  As I testified to the Senate, I have doubts that the Act is good policy and am pretty sure that it will not improve the medical situation or the wallet of well-insured, upper-middle-class, well-connected persons like me. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 11:22 pm by Kevin O'Keefe
Cover Apple v Samsung and who are you going to build relationships and influence with? [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 6:58 am by Susan Brenner
  She shared an office with Shareatha in the Madison branch of the Credit Union, and she claimed Terrell called “in early January because he was `missing a significant amount of money. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 11:03 am by Lindsay Griffiths
Stuart said he would show us how Chief Justice Roberts maneuvered, and many are praising him, saying that this is what John Marshall did in Marbury v Madison. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 12:30 am
 In a line of cases going back to 1977's Abood v. [read post]