Search for: "West v. United States" Results 881 - 900 of 4,135
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2021, 8:15 am by Unknown
The OA articles in this listing were previously referenced on this blog as of 1 January 2021.Bronze OA:"An Analysis of the ECtHR Judgment in the Case of N.D. and N.T. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 7:47 am by Sam Cohen, Steve Floyd
Japan criticized China for continuing to reject the ruling in Philippines v. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
  In the United States at the end of the millennium, even liberals with gay friends viewed the social group through the lens of sexuality. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 2:32 pm by Phil Dixon
A drug dog unit arrived on scene and performed a sniff of the defendant’s vehicle. [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
United States The Supreme Court of the State of New York’s Second Department has overturned a decades-old precedent when it ruled that a false claim of homosexuality is no longer defamation per se. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 11:53 am
These are battles that have continued in the West certainly since the time of Aristotle and are embedded in all sorts of law systems—from the Common Law  to the agendas of administrative agencies. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 4:15 am by IPWatchdog
On January 8, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) affirmed a decision of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) dismissing QuikTrip West, Inc. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 4:15 am by IPWatchdog
On January 8, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) affirmed a decision of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) dismissing QuikTrip West, Inc. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 12:44 am by Léon Dijkman
Ericsson also asked for and obtained an indemnity in case the Wuhan Court fines Ericsson for participating in its US case or asserting its United States patent rights for the amount of the fine. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 9:17 am by Giles Peaker
Further, following Lady Hale and Lord Kerr’s judgments in ZH (Tanzania) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 4, Article 3(1) of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of the Child 1959 should be applied such that a primacy of importance must be given to the best interests of a child. [read post]