Search for: "v. Smith"
Results 881 - 900
of 16,211
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2023, 4:28 am
In Koon v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:38 am
While Huawei v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:02 am
On 11 July 2023, the Court of Appeal heard an appeal over undertakings in the harassment case of Smith v Backhouse. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 11:56 pm
“ Top 3 Kluwer Trademark Blog posts 1) Good for the Goose: Own goal for Lidl in future lookalike cases by Julius Stobbs, Amelia Sainsbury and Nirmal Trivedy “This post is the first of four looking at the decision of Smith J in Lidl & another v Tesco & another [2023] EWHC 873 (Ch). [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 11:56 pm
“ Top 3 Kluwer Trademark Blog posts 1) Good for the Goose: Own goal for Lidl in future lookalike cases by Julius Stobbs, Amelia Sainsbury and Nirmal Trivedy “This post is the first of four looking at the decision of Smith J in Lidl & another v Tesco & another [2023] EWHC 873 (Ch). [read post]
15 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Brackeen AB 599/1 37 6/15/23 21-1576 Smith v. [read post]
15 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Brackeen AB 599/1 37 6/15/23 21-1576 Smith v. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 9:04 am
The transition from first-to-invent to first-to-file has involved a number of quirks, the latest is found in SNIPR Technologies Ltd. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 5:00 am
Moreover, there are no allegations related to breaching a promise to acehive a specific result, but only allegations about breaches of vague and non-specific (and somewhat boilerplate) provisions of the retainer agreement (see Mamoon v Dot Net Inc., 135 AD3d 656 [1st Dept 2016] citing Sage Realty Corp. v Proskauer Rose, 251 AD2d 3 5, 3 9 [1st Dept 1998] [ dismissing breach of contract claim as duplicative of legal malpractice claim where there were no allegations about a breach of… [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 9:16 pm
Supreme Court’s ruling in Biden v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 7:28 pm
The Georgia Supreme Court, in Nunn v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 5:01 am
Smith (9th Cir. 2003)). [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 4:31 am
The classified documents indictment offers insight into Smith’s possible thinking here. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 12:15 am
Smith v. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 9:29 am
See, e.g., Smith v. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 6:39 am
Samia v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 4:05 pm
Cynthia Godsoe (Brooklyn Law School), Abbe Smith (Georgetown University Law Center), & Ellen Yaroshefsky (Hofstra University - Maurice A. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 11:15 am
This episode is a follow-up podcast to Episode 9, Epic v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 7:24 am
To illustrate, in Shore v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 5:00 am
In the case of Ehmer v. [read post]
