Search for: "DOES 1-12"
Results 8981 - 9000
of 28,866
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2015, 8:54 am
Only 12 percent of the cases on appeal receive oral argument. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 6:24 pm
The amount of the payment for the month equals the number of full-time employees the employer employed for the month (minus up to 30) multiplied by 1/12 of $2,000. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 1:03 am
At the same time, however, the Court does not draw the consequences of its interpretation, tending in particular to ignore to some extent Article 12 of the ETSI policy, which provides that its interpretation is a matter for French law. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 1:50 pm
In her decision dated June 23, 2015, Arbitrator Suesan Alves found: ..subsection 12(4) of the Schedule does NOT permit Allstate to deduct Ms. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 8:55 pm
Mr Latter does not suggest that the firm should complete this by New Year’s Eve if it has not yet started. [read post]
2 Jul 2024, 4:44 pm
[12] California Civil Code Section 1780 [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 1:54 pm
This does not apply to a licensed attorney giving legal advice to a client. 718.112(r)(1), Florida Statutes and 718.112(r)(2), Florida Statutes Establishes additional director or officer offenses, including charges or indictment with specific crimes, that result in the removal of the officer or director from office. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 11:05 pm
Here's more in the continuing "Year in Review" series, delivering more of my backlog of twitter posts of case developments in the past 12 months. [read post]
1 Sep 2018, 9:28 am
State, 12 S.W.3d 6, 30 (Tex. 1999); see Walker v. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 4:30 am
Courts examine substantial similarity at the pleading level (typically on a Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss). [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm
When an applicant is represented by a professional representative, then, according to decision J 5/80 [headnote 1], the request for re-establishment cannot be acceded to unless the representative himself can show that he has taken the due care required of an applicant by A 122(1). [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 2:11 pm
Nor does it follow that the test is a purely quantitative one. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 2:02 pm
LEXIS 112, **12-16. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 7:17 am
1. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 5:01 pm
” in R 36(1) does not set a period/time limit, but rather sets a condition; see e.g. [read post]
13 Dec 2020, 6:10 pm
CEQA does not apply to the consultation process. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 3:01 pm
”[12] The [opponent] has explained during the OPs before the Board of appeal that its request would have had to be granted, even though it had not given any corresponding indications what it wanted to show with the overhead projector.The Board does not share this opinion and refers to the decision T 1122/01 [2] cited by the [patent proprietor]. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 12:27 pm
See, e.g., Doe v. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 8:39 am
Amgen Inc., et al., No. 16-332 (effectively extending exclusivity to 12 1/2 years; complement to the Sandoz petition) Mylan Pharmaceuticals, et al. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 12:13 pm
” Doe v. [read post]
