Search for: "Grant v. State"
Results 8981 - 9000
of 61,360
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Nov 2010, 4:30 am
State v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 6:32 am
Bd. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 6:30 pm
In granting the defendant’s motion, the Court stated that one [...] [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 12:01 pm
The Court granted summary [...] [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 7:45 pm
In Rogers v. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 8:59 am
The Supreme Court’s recent decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 6:00 am
(Watervale Marine Co., LTD v. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 7:03 pm
A federal judge in Rhode Island granted a default judgment against one of the defendants for $33 million. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 9:43 am
(Orin Kerr) Last year I drafted a cert petition in McCane v. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 5:36 am
” Orin suggests that a passage from United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2021, 11:29 am
Attorney General United States, No. 19-1404 (3d Cir. 2020) Related posts: Fourth Circuit Rejects Anti-Spam Lawsuit–Omega World Travel v. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 2:21 am
In a case brought by Rights of Women determined in February this year, the Court of Appeal concluded that Regulations made under LASPO requiring victims of domestic violence to satisfy onerous evidential requirements directed at establishing the necessary victimhood as a condition of a grant of legal aid, were contrary to the purpose of LASPO and unlawful (R (Rights of Women) v Secretary of State for Justice [2016] EWCA Civ 91). [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 7:46 am
Supreme Court has granted cert in E.M.A. ex rel Plyler v. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 9:04 am
In our submission, we address: (i) the importance of the decision and task of the Court, (ii) the reasons why the states should be held accountable for collateral over-blocking of the websites by private parties, (iii) importance of specific legal basis as to the target and means of blocking, (iv) the need to observe the principle of proportionality in grant and implementation of website blocking and (v) available remedies against the abuse of website blocking. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 5:45 pm
In our submission, we address: (i) the importance of the decision and task of the Court, (ii) the reasons why the states should be held accountable for collateral over-blocking of the websites by private parties, (iii) importance of specific legal basis as to the target and means of blocking, (iv) the need to observe the principle of proportionality in grant and implementation of website blocking and (v) available remedies against the abuse of website blocking. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 12:45 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 May 2022, 12:06 pm
In Covis Pharma GmbH v. [read post]
9 May 2022, 12:06 pm
In Covis Pharma GmbH v. [read post]
9 May 2022, 12:06 pm
In Covis Pharma GmbH v. [read post]
