Search for: "Grant v. State"
Results 8981 - 9000
of 68,544
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2015, 9:18 am
The case of McNaughton v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 8:11 am
The Supreme Court of the United States has granted certiorari in another arbitration case. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 7:44 pm
The district court granted summary judgment for Monsanto and issued a permanent injunction. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 6:56 am
Bed Bath & Beyond subsequently filed a motion for an award of attorney fees, which the district court granted. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 5:55 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 5:50 am
Samuels v. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 12:12 pm
Bilski v. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 5:16 am
Plaintiff, meanwhile, appealed the split-recovery ruling, pursuant to Georgia law, that grants 75 percent of punitive damages to the state. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 5:16 am
Plaintiff, meanwhile, appealed the split-recovery ruling, pursuant to Georgia law, that grants 75 percent of punitive damages to the state. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 5:16 am
Plaintiff, meanwhile, appealed the split-recovery ruling, pursuant to Georgia law, that grants 75 percent of punitive damages to the state. [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 5:00 am
See Irby v. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 8:20 am
State District Judge Bruce Romanick, however, found the request was “not appropriate,” stating the Plaintiffs “presented no authority for the Court to grant the specific relief requested. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 9:13 am
” Wildearth Guardians v. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 4:23 pm
Lilly’s motion is granted. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 12:26 pm
Appealed from the United States Court of Federal Claims. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 3:36 pm
Office of Hawaiian Affairs, No. 07-1372 (cert. granted Oct. 1, 2008). [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 6:41 am
Citing with approval the recent judgment of the International Court of Justice (“ICJ”) in Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 2:22 pm
In East Sussex Children Services v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 3:58 am
The Court also rejected the argument that the courts’ jurisdiction to grant interim measures in support of employment tribunal proceedings must be expressly stated in legislation, and not case law, to be sufficiently clear and accessible to comply with the principle of effectiveness. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 1:32 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon. [read post]
