Search for: "High v State"
Results 8981 - 9000
of 35,522
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Nov 2012, 1:27 am
At a hearing three weeks ago, a UK High Court judge set that month as the date for trial in Graiseley Properties Limited v. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 8:00 am
Theoretically, this essay argues that these contexts are useful, if not essential, to understanding most high-profile, high-significance lawsuits, like Dred Scott v. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 4:37 pm
State of Washington DOT. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 7:41 am
The stakes on remand are high, of course — a lack of standing means no day at all in federal court. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 11:43 am
(God I love state court). [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 12:53 pm
From State v. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 6:00 am
Vivendi Universal in 2012 and $253 million in the employment case Velez v. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 5:00 pm
Miles Medical Co. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 1:30 am
Simpkins v. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 11:54 am
"These are the conditions that prevailed for the nearly full month that it took to move these detainees by slow boat to the United States. [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 2:35 pm
State v. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 12:05 pm
by Dennis Crouch Each summer, the Supreme Court takes a recess and patent cases begin to pile-up in the high-court’s docket. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 10:10 am
In two recent decisions, Fordham v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 7:04 pm
Gutierrez 13-347Issue: Whether under United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 8:17 am
Bank v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 3:54 pm
The Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 4:00 am
CPR 3.1(7) states that “A power of the court under these Rules to make an order includes a power to vary or revoke the order”. [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 7:25 am
The High Court struck out the whole of the Liquidation Application. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 8:53 pm
State v. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 9:39 am
ShareMary Ziegler is a law professor at Florida State University and the author of Abortion and the Law in America: Roe v. [read post]
