Search for: "In Re Julie" Results 8981 - 9000 of 22,403
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Nov 2014, 10:50 am by Margaret Wood
Almost every year, in the fall, I find myself picking up The Lord of the Rings and re-reading parts of it. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 3:26 pm by Jeffrey Carr
Anyone who writes for a living has a duty to make sure that when they present two facts, they don’t do so in a way that misleads a reader into thinking that they’re related, unless that relationship is firmly established. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 9:34 am by Steve Hall
  If you're interested in a signed copy, contact Fox books. [read post]
16 Sep 2017, 9:47 am by Juan C. Antúnez
If you’re a working probate attorney, elective share claims loom large in your practice. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 11:31 am by Amy Corbett Dion, Esq.
  Both cases were re-heard by the Third Circuit Court of Appeals, sitting en banc, which recently ruled in favor of the student in both cases. [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 3:58 am
But today we're back with our NCADP 2008: Reaching for the Dream awardees. [read post]
24 Jun 2007, 7:15 am
" The budget part appropriates funds for the fiscal biennium beginning July 1, 2007. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 7:29 am by Gritsforbreakfast
His National Action Party (PAN) emerged seriously weakened from a dramatic set-back suffered in the July congressional elections and was unable to recoup any real momentum during the last legislative session. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 4:19 am by Mack Sperling
Judge Gale’s approval last week of a class action settlement, in In re Krispy Kreme Doughnuts, Inc. [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 2:58 pm by John Mattox
Let’s suppose you’re a contractor that provides services to the federal government. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 3:04 am by Marie Louise
(BIOtechNOW) US: PTO agrees to reexamine broad codon-optimization patents (Holman’s Biotech IP Blog) US: Inherently incomprehensible: Does the CAFC’s view of inherency in In Re Kao spell the end of second medical use patents in the USA? [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 10:25 am by Dennis Crouch
July 27, 2023) In a recent tax appeal, the Third Circuit court of appeals afformed that legal expenses incurred by generic drug makers to defend against patent infringement suits brought under the Hatch-Waxman Act are deductible as ordinary and necessary business expenses. [read post]